Literature DB >> 15279289

Susceptibility of spinosad in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) field populations.

Michael Kristensen1, Jørgen B Jespersen.   

Abstract

The toxicity of spinosad was determined in one susceptible and five insecticide-resistant laboratory strains of house fly, Musca domestica L. Spinosad was relatively slow-acting, but highly toxic to house flies. In a feeding bioassay, spinosad LC50 at 72 h was 0.51 microg of spinosad per gram of sugar, making it 6.3- and 3.5-fold more toxic to house flies compared with azamethiphos and methomyl, respectively. In topical application bioassay, the LD50 at 48 h of spinosad in susceptible house flies was 40 ng per 20 mg of house fly, making spinosad less toxic than the pyrethroid bioresmethrin synergized by piperonyl butoxide and the organophosphate dimethoate. The insecticide-resistant laboratory strains had resistance factors to spinosad at LC50 in feeding bioassay from 1.5 to 5.5 and at LD50 in topical application bioassay from 2.5 to 4.7, indicating that in house fly cross-resistance to the major insecticide classes will not initially be of major concern for the use of spinosad for house fly control. The toxicity of spinosad was also evaluated against 31 field populations of house flies collected from livestock farms across Denmark. The field populations were 2.2- to 7.5-fold resistant to spinosad at 72 h in feeding bioassay, but based on steep slopes in the bioassay and the limited variation of spinosad toxicity against the various field populations, we consider the field populations to be spinosad-susceptible. We propose a diagnostic dose of 12 microg of spinosad per gram of sugar in feeding bioassay with impregnated sugar for determination of resistant house flies, which is 10x the LC95 of the susceptible strain WHO and approximately = 2x the LD95 of the field populations. Spinosad showed no substantial cross-resistance to the pyrethroid bioresmethrin synergized by piperonyl butoxide, the anticholinesterases dimethoate, azamethiphos, methomyl, and spinosad in house fly field populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279289     DOI: 10.1093/jee/97.3.1042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review on the toxicity and non-target effects of macrocyclic lactones in terrestrial and aquatic environments.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Lumaret; Faiek Errouissi; Kevin Floate; Jörg Römbke; Keith Wardhaugh
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.837

Review 2.  Side-effects of pesticides on non-target insects in agriculture: a mini-review.

Authors:  José Eduardo Serrão; Angelica Plata-Rueda; Luis Carlos Martínez; José Cola Zanuncio
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-02-09

3.  Interactions between Entomopathogenic Fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae and Sublethal Doses of Spinosad for Control of House Fly, Musca domestica.

Authors:  M Sharififard; Ms Mossadegh; B Vazirianzadeh; A Zarei-Mahmoudabadi
Journal:  Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2011-06-30

4.  Transcriptome Analysis of an Insecticide Resistant Housefly Strain: Insights about SNPs and Regulatory Elements in Cytochrome P450 Genes.

Authors:  Khalid Mahmood; Dorte H Højland; Torben Asp; Michael Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes Related to Resistance in Spinosad- and Neonicotinoid-Resistant Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) Strains.

Authors:  Dorte H Højland; Michael Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Oral and Topical Insecticide Response Bioassays and Associated Statistical Analyses Used Commonly in Veterinary and Medical Entomology.

Authors:  Edwin R Burgess; Bethia H King; Christopher J Geden
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 1.857

7.  Expression of xenobiotic metabolizing cytochrome P450 genes in a spinosad-resistant Musca domestica L. strain.

Authors:  Dorte H Højland; Karl-Martin Vagn Jensen; Michael Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.