Literature DB >> 15278216

Comparative genomics: methods and applications.

Bernhard Haubold1, Thomas Wiehe.   

Abstract

Interpreting the functional content of a given genomic sequence is one of the central challenges of biology today. Perhaps the most promising approach to this problem is based on the comparative method of classic biology in the modern guise of sequence comparison. For instance, protein-coding regions tend to be conserved between species. Hence, a simple method for distinguishing a functional exon from the chance absence of stop codons is to investigate its homologue from closely related species. Predicting regulatory elements is even more difficult than exon prediction, but again, comparisons pinpointing conserved sequence motifs upstream of translation start sites are helping to unravel gene regulatory networks. In addition to interspecific studies, intraspecific sequence comparison yields insights into the evolutionary forces that have acted on a species in the past. Of particular interest here is the identification of selection events such as selective sweeps. Both intra- and interspecific sequence comparisons are based on a variety of computational methods, including alignment, phylogenetic reconstruction, and coalescent theory. This article surveys the biology and the central computational ideas applied in recent comparative genomics projects. We argue that the most fruitful method of understanding the functional content of genomes is to study them in the context of related genomic sequences. In particular, such a study may reveal selection, a fundamental pointer to biological relevance.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15278216     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-004-0542-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  112 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; Lino Ometto; Sylvain Mousset; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gavin; Markus Bösche; Roland Krause; Paola Grandi; Martina Marzioch; Andreas Bauer; Jörg Schultz; Jens M Rick; Anne-Marie Michon; Cristina-Maria Cruciat; Marita Remor; Christian Höfert; Malgorzata Schelder; Miro Brajenovic; Heinz Ruffner; Alejandro Merino; Karin Klein; Manuela Hudak; David Dickson; Tatjana Rudi; Volker Gnau; Angela Bauch; Sonja Bastuck; Bettina Huhse; Christina Leutwein; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Richard R Copley; Angela Edelmann; Erich Querfurth; Vladimir Rybin; Gerard Drewes; Manfred Raida; Tewis Bouwmeester; Peer Bork; Bertrand Seraphin; Bernhard Kuster; Gitte Neubauer; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Small is beautiful: comparative genomics with the pufferfish (Fugu rubripes).

Authors:  G Elgar; R Sandford; S Aparicio; A Macrae; B Venkatesh; S Brenner
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Identification of protein coding regions by database similarity search.

Authors:  W Gish; D J States
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Inference of haplotypes from samples of diploid populations: complexity and algorithms.

Authors:  D Gusfield
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.479

10.  Systematic discovery of new genes in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  Marco M Kessler; Qiandong Zeng; Sarah Hogan; Robin Cook; Arturo J Morales; Guillaume Cottarel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparative plant genomics. Frontiers and prospects.

Authors:  Ana L Caicedo; Michael D Purugganan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Intronic elements in the Na+/I- symporter gene (NIS) interact with retinoic acid receptors and mediate initiation of transcription.

Authors:  Hani Alotaibi; Elif Yaman; Domenico Salvatore; Valeria Di Dato; Pelin Telkoparan; Roberto Di Lauro; Uygar H Tazebay
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria.

Authors:  Paul M Sharp; Elizabeth Bailes; Russell J Grocock; John F Peden; R Elizabeth Sockett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  transAlign: using amino acids to facilitate the multiple alignment of protein-coding DNA sequences.

Authors:  Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Genome comparison without alignment using shortest unique substrings.

Authors:  Bernhard Haubold; Nora Pierstorff; Friedrich Möller; Thomas Wiehe
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Functionally Significant Features in the 5' Untranslated Region of the ABCA1 Gene and Their Comparison in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Pavel Dvorak; Sarah Leupen; Pavel Soucek
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Regulatory circuit of human microRNA biogenesis.

Authors:  Ji Lee; Zhihua Li; Rachel Brower-Sinning; Bino John
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.