Literature DB >> 15275907

Age differences in neural correlates of route encoding and route recognition.

Olga Meulenbroek1, Karl Magnus Petersson, Nicol Voermans, Bernd Weber, Guillén Fernández.   

Abstract

Spatial memory deficits are core features of aging-related changes in cognitive abilities. The neural correlates of these deficits are largely unknown. In the present study, we investigated the neural underpinnings of age-related differences in spatial memory by functional MRI using a navigational memory task with route encoding and route recognition conditions. We investigated 20 healthy young (18-29 years old) and 20 healthy old adults (53-78 years old) in a random effects analysis. Old subjects showed slightly poorer performance than young subjects. Compared to the control condition, route encoding and route recognition showed activation of the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams and the frontal eye fields in both groups of subjects. Compared to old adults, young subjects showed during route encoding stronger activations in the dorsal and the ventral visual processing stream (supramarginal gyrus and posterior fusiform/parahippocampal areas). In addition, young subjects showed weaker anterior parahippocampal activity during route recognition compared to the old group. In contrast, old compared to young subjects showed less suppressed activity in the left perisylvian region and the anterior cingulate cortex during route encoding. Our findings suggest that age-related navigational memory deficits might be caused by less effective route encoding based on reduced posterior fusiform/parahippocampal and parietal functionality combined with diminished inhibition of perisylvian and anterior cingulate cortices correlated with less effective suppression of task-irrelevant information. In contrast, age differences in neural correlates of route recognition seem to be rather subtle. Old subjects might show a diminished familiarity signal during route recognition in the anterior parahippocampal region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15275907     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  29 in total

1.  Familiar environments enhance object and spatial memory in both younger and older adults.

Authors:  Niamh A Merriman; Jan Ondřej; Eugenie Roudaia; Carol O'Sullivan; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Efficiency of route selection as a function of adult age.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; Karen L Siedlecki
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Aging: compensation or maturation?

Authors:  Cheryl J Aine; Chad C Woodruff; Janice E Knoefel; John C Adair; David Hudson; Clifford Qualls; Jeremy Bockholt; Elaine Best; Sanja Kovacevic; Wayne Cobb; Denise Padilla; Blaine Hart; Julia M Stephen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Aging and spatial navigation: what do we know and where do we go?

Authors:  Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging.

Authors:  Simon W Davis; Nancy A Dennis; Sander M Daselaar; Mathias S Fleck; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Age-Related Reversals in Neural Recruitment across Memory Retrieval Phases.

Authors:  Jaclyn H Ford; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Modulative effects of COMT haplotype on age-related associations with brain morphology.

Authors:  Annie Lee; Anqi Qiu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Age-related effects on spatial memory across viewpoint changes relative to different reference frames.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Valentina Sulpizio; Gaspare Galati; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-19

9.  The application of a rodent-based Morris water maze (MWM) protocol to an investigation of age-related differences in human spatial learning.

Authors:  Jimmy Y Zhong; Kathy R Magnusson; Matthew E Swarts; Cherita A Clendinen; Nadjalisse C Reynolds; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Different strategies for auditory word recognition in healthy versus normal aging.

Authors:  C J Aine; J E Bryant; J E Knoefel; J C Adair; B Hart; C H Donahue; R Montaño; R Hayek; C Qualls; D Ranken; J M Stephen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.