Literature DB >> 15271275

Positive association between current health and health values for hypothetical disease states.

Joseph T King1, Joel Tsevat, Mark S Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valuations of hypothetical health state scenarios can be affected by participant characteristics.
METHODS: The authors interviewed 108 veterans using the visual analogue scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), time tradeoff (TTO), and willingness to pay (WTP) to measure health values for 1) current health and 2) 3 hypothetical health states portrayed in written scenarios describing cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), a degenerative spine condition. They used bivariate rank order and multivariate regression analyses to assess the relationship between CSM values, participants' characteristics, and participants' current health values.
RESULTS: Participants were predominantly male (89.8%) and Caucasian (75.9%), with a median age of 58.3 years and a median annual income of $15,000. Median values for current health were VAS, 0.75; SG, 0.80; TTO, 0.80; and WTP, $25,000. In the multivariate analysis, higher CSM values were associated with better current health as measured with the SG, TTO, and WTP (for all, P < 0.001); there was no association with VAS values (P = 0.157).
CONCLUSIONS: Health values for CSM are positively associated with the current health of the study population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15271275     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04267692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  11 in total

1.  Valuation of depression co-occurring with a somatic condition: feasibility of the time trade-off task.

Authors:  Katerina Papageorgiou; Karin M Vermeulen; Fenna R M Leijten; Erik Buskens; Adelita V Ranchor; Maya J Schroevers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules.

Authors:  Samuel D Shillcutt; Damian G Walker; Catherine A Goodman; Anne J Mills
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Time trade-off health state utility values for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Péter György Balázs; Dalma Erdősi; Antal Zemplényi; Valentin Brodszky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.440

4.  Baseline characteristics and treatment preferences of oral surgery patients.

Authors:  Kathryn A Atchison; Melanie W Gironda; Edward E Black; Stuart Schweitzer; Claudia Der-Martirosian; Alan Felsenfeld; Richard Leathers; Thomas R Belin
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Eliciting utilities using functional methodology: people's disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Alexandra Gamelin; María Teresa Muñoz Sastre; Paul Clay Sorum; Etienne Mullet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Hidden costs: The ethics of cost-effectiveness analyses for health interventions in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Sarah E Rutstein; Joan T Price; Nora E Rosenberg; Stuart M Rennie; Andrea K Biddle; William C Miller
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2016-05-04

7.  A randomized study of scleroderma health state values: a picture is worth a thousand words, and quite a few utiles. [corrected].

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Robert M Kaplan; Mark H Eckman; Ron D Hays; Anthony C Leonard; Shaari S Ginsburg; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 8.  Contingent Valuation Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Health Economic Review.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Claire D Eliasberg; Kamran S Hamid; Michael C Fu; Bernard R Bach; Answorth A Allen; Todd J Albert
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-04-09

9.  A pilot Internet "value of health" panel: recruitment, participation and compliance.

Authors:  Ken Stein; Matthew Dyer; Tania Crabb; Ruairidh Milne; Alison Round; Julie Ratcliffe; John Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Individual differences in the use of the response scale determine valuations of hypothetical health states: an empirical study.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Marja C Stuifbergen; Willem-Jan Meerding; Caspar W N Looman; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.