Literature DB >> 15270502

Campylobacter colonization of sibling turkey flocks reared under different management conditions.

Katie Smith1, Nancy Reimers, H John Barnes, Bong Choon Lee, Robin Siletzky, Sophia Kathariou.   

Abstract

Uncertainty exists concerning the key factors contributing to Campylobacter colonization of poultry, especially the possible role of vertical transmission from breeder hens to young birds. A longitudinal study of Campylobacter colonization was performed in two sibling pairs of turkey flocks (four flocks total). Each pair of sibling flocks shared breeder hen populations and was obtained from the same hatchery. One flock of each pair was grown on a commercial farm, and the other was grown in an instructional demonstration unit (Teaching Animal Unit [TAU]). Flocks were located within a 60-mi (96.8-km) radius. The time of placement, feed formulations, stocking density, and general husbandry were the same for both flocks, and each flock was processed at a commercial processing plant following standard feed withdrawal and transport protocols. Both flocks grown on the commercial farms became colonized with Campylobacter between weeks 2 and 3 and remained colonized until processing. Between 80 and 90% of isolates were Campylobacter coli, and the remainder were Campylobacter jejuni. In contrast, neither C. coli nor C. jejuni were isolated from either of the TAU flocks at any time during the production cycle. None of the fla types of Campylobacter from the breeders that provided poults to one of the commercial flocks matched those from the progeny. These results failed to provide evidence for vertical transmission and indicate that this type of transmission either did not occur or was not sufficient to render the TAU turkey flocks Campylobacter positive. Management practices such as proper litter maintenance, controlled traffic between the TAU farm and other turkey flocks, and other less well-defined aspects of turkey production were likely responsible for the absence of Campylobacter in the TAU flocks before harvest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15270502     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  18 in total

Review 1.  Biosecurity-based interventions and strategies to reduce Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms.

Authors:  D G Newell; K T Elvers; D Dopfer; I Hansson; P Jones; S James; J Gittins; N J Stern; R Davies; I Connerton; D Pearson; G Salvat; V M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in commercial turkey flocks: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Isaac P Kashoma; Anand Kumar; Yasser M Sanad; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Rudovick R Kazwala; Rebecca Garabed; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  The absence of intervening sequences in 23S rRNA genes of Campylobacter coli isolates from Turkeys is a unique attribute of a cluster of related strains which also lack resistance to erythromycin.

Authors:  Kamfai Chan; William G Miller; Robert E Mandrell; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Differences in methylation at GATC sites in genomic DNA of Campylobacter coli from turkeys and swine.

Authors:  Sandra Wright; Simone Wilson; William G Miller; Robert E Mandrell; Robin M Siletzky; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Proximity to Other Commercial Turkey Farms Affects Colonization Onset, Genotypes, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter spp. in Turkeys: Suggestive Evidence from a Paired-Farm Model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Niedermeyer; Lynde Ring; William G Miller; Seiche Genger; Christina Parr Lindsey; Jason Osborne; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Strain-Specific Differences in Survival of Campylobacter spp. in Naturally Contaminated Turkey Feces and Water.

Authors:  Lesley Good; William G Miller; Jeffrey Niedermeyer; Jason Osborne; Robin M Siletzky; Donna Carver; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Lack of evidence for vertical transmission of Campylobacter spp. in chickens.

Authors:  Kenneth A Callicott; Vala Friethriksdóttir; Jarle Reiersen; Ruff Lowman; Jean-Robert Bisaillon; Eggert Gunnarsson; Eva Berndtson; Kelli L Hiett; David S Needleman; Norman J Stern
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Differential effects of temperature on natural transformation to erythromycin and nalidixic acid resistance in Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  Joo-Sung Kim; Jae-Won Kim; S Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Natural transformation-mediated transfer of erythromycin resistance in Campylobacter coli strains from turkeys and swine.

Authors:  Joo-Sung Kim; Donna K Carver; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Antimicrobial resistance profiling and molecular subtyping of Campylobacter spp. from processed turkey.

Authors:  Ellen M Lutgen; John M McEvoy; Julie S Sherwood; Catherine M Logue
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.