Literature DB >> 15270454

Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions.

C Champod1, I W Evett, G Jackson.   

Abstract

Previous papers in Science & Justice have described the work of the Case Assessment and Interpretation (CAI) project that has been running for several years within the Forensic Science Service (FSS). The principles of the CAI model, which have developed through casework, are the foundation of a balanced, robust and logical approach to interpretation. The question arises frequently as to what is the most appropriate database that should be available to assist in assigning a value to a given probability. In this paper we present a set of guidelines in the form of flowcharts and explore them within the context of a range of case examples.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15270454     DOI: 10.1016/S1355-0306(04)71708-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  3 in total

1.  A response to "Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look" by Lund and Iyer.

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Charles E H Berger; Graham Jackson; Ian W Evett; Christophe Champod; Bernard Robertson; James M Curran; Duncan Taylor; Bruce S Weir; Michael D Coble; John S Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Use of data to inform expert evaluative opinion in the comparison of hand images-the importance of scars.

Authors:  Graham Jackson; Sue Black
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Source-anchored, trace-anchored, and general match score-based likelihood ratios for camera device identification.

Authors:  Stephanie Reinders; Yong Guan; Danica Ommen; Jennifer Newman
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 1.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.