PURPOSE: To explore the relationship of myocardial T(2) and oxygenation for the quantification of myocardial oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A proposed myocardial T(2)-OEF relationship was evaluated by computer simulation and in nine normal dogs in vivo. The relationship was based on a simplified two-compartment T(2) model. In the dogs, dipyridamole was infused intravenously to increase blood flow and change in myocardial oxygen content. The accuracy of the measurement in myocardial OEF in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was determined by arterial and coronary sinus blood sampling. RESULTS: Global myocardial T(2) increased 16.1% from rest to the peak of dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (44.6 +/- 2.1 msec vs. 51.4 +/- 2.1 msec, P < 0.001). Corresponding OEF measured by arterial and venous (AV) sampling decreased from 0.64 +/- 0.15 at rest to 0.18 +/- 0.08 during the dipyridamole vasodilation, whereas OEF calculated by MRI at the peak effect of dipyridamole was 20 +/- 4%. Global myocardial OEF measured dynamically by MRI showed a strong correlation with OEF measured by blood sampling (correlation coefficient (CC) = 0.83) during pharmacologic vasodilation. CONCLUSION: When combined with vasodilator stress, assessment of OEF may provide a putative measure of myocardial flow reserve, allowing consecutive monitoring of myocardial dose-responses to a variety of interventions and offering a new tool for the detection of coronary artery disease. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To explore the relationship of myocardial T(2) and oxygenation for the quantification of myocardial oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A proposed myocardial T(2)-OEF relationship was evaluated by computer simulation and in nine normal dogs in vivo. The relationship was based on a simplified two-compartment T(2) model. In the dogs, dipyridamole was infused intravenously to increase blood flow and change in myocardial oxygen content. The accuracy of the measurement in myocardial OEF in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was determined by arterial and coronary sinus blood sampling. RESULTS:Global myocardial T(2) increased 16.1% from rest to the peak of dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (44.6 +/- 2.1 msec vs. 51.4 +/- 2.1 msec, P < 0.001). Corresponding OEF measured by arterial and venous (AV) sampling decreased from 0.64 +/- 0.15 at rest to 0.18 +/- 0.08 during the dipyridamole vasodilation, whereas OEF calculated by MRI at the peak effect of dipyridamole was 20 +/- 4%. Global myocardial OEF measured dynamically by MRI showed a strong correlation with OEF measured by blood sampling (correlation coefficient (CC) = 0.83) during pharmacologic vasodilation. CONCLUSION: When combined with vasodilator stress, assessment of OEF may provide a putative measure of myocardial flow reserve, allowing consecutive monitoring of myocardial dose-responses to a variety of interventions and offering a new tool for the detection of coronary artery disease. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Kyle S McCommis; Robert O'Connor; Dana R Abendschein; David Muccigrosso; Robert J Gropler; Jie Zheng Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Erica Dall'Armellina; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Stefan Neubauer; Robin P Choudhury Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Kyle S McCommis; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Haosen Zhang; Thomas A Goldstein; Benjamin E Northrup; Debiao Li; Robert J Gropler; Jie Zheng Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jeffrey M Dendy; Sean G Hughes; Jonathan H Soslow; Daniel E Clark; Cynthia B Paschal; John C Gore Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 10.065
Authors: Kyle S McCommis; Haosen Zhang; Thomas A Goldstein; Bernd Misselwitz; Dana R Abendschein; Robert J Gropler; Jie Zheng Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-11
Authors: Kyle S McCommis; Robert O'Connor; Donna Lesniak; Matt Lyons; Pamela K Woodard; Robert J Gropler; Jie Zheng Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-06-02 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Kyle S McCommis; Thomas A Goldstein; Dana R Abendschein; Pilar Herrero; Bernd Misselwitz; Robert J Gropler; Jie Zheng Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-11-20 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Hsin-Jung Yang; Damini Dey; Jane Sykes; John Butler; Heather Biernaski; Michael Kovacs; Xiaoming Bi; Behzad Sharif; Ivan Cokic; Richard Tang; Piotr Slomka; Frank S Prato; Rohan Dharmakumar Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 29.146