Literature DB >> 32096705

Heart Rate-Independent 3D Myocardial Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MRI at 3.0 T with Simultaneous 13N-Ammonia PET Validation.

Hsin-Jung Yang1, Damini Dey1, Jane Sykes1, John Butler1, Heather Biernaski1, Michael Kovacs1, Xiaoming Bi1, Behzad Sharif1, Ivan Cokic1, Richard Tang1, Piotr Slomka1, Frank S Prato1, Rohan Dharmakumar1.   

Abstract

Background Despite advances, blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) cardiac MRI for myocardial perfusion is limited by inadequate spatial coverage, imaging speed, multiple breath holds, and imaging artifacts, particularly at 3.0 T. Purpose To develop and validate a robust, contrast agent-unenhanced, free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) cardiac MRI approach for reliably examining changes in myocardial perfusion between rest and adenosine stress. Materials and Methods A heart rate-independent, free-breathing 3D T2 mapping technique at 3.0 T that can be completed within the period of adenosine stress (≤4 minutes) was developed by using computer simulations, ex vivo heart preparations, and dogs. Studies in dogs were performed with and without coronary stenosis and validated with simultaneously acquired nitrogen 13 (13N) ammonia PET perfusion in a clinical PET/MRI system. The MRI approach was also prospectively evaluated in healthy human volunteers (from January 2017 to September 2017). Myocardial BOLD responses (MBRs) between normal and ischemic myocardium were compared with mixed model analysis. Results Dogs (n = 10; weight range, 20-25 kg; mongrel dogs) and healthy human volunteers (n = 10; age range, 22-53 years; seven men) were evaluated. In healthy dogs, T2 MRI at adenosine stress was greater than at rest (mean rest vs stress, 38.7 msec ± 2.5 [standard deviation] vs 45.4 msec ± 3.3, respectively; MBR, 1.19 ± 0.08; both, P < .001). At the same conditions, mean rest versus stress PET perfusion was 1.1 mL/mg/min ± 0.11 versus 2.3 mL/mg/min ± 0.82, respectively (P < .001); myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was 2.4 ± 0.82 (P < .001). The BOLD response and PET MPR were positively correlated (R = 0.67; P < .001). In dogs with coronary stenosis, perfusion anomalies were detected on the basis of MBR (normal vs ischemic, 1.09 ± 0.05 vs 1.00 ± 0.04, respectively; P < .001) and MPR (normal vs ischemic, 2.7 ± 0.08 vs 1.7 ± 1.1, respectively; P < .001). Human volunteers showed increased myocardial T2 at stress (rest vs stress, 44.5 msec ± 2.6 vs 49.0 msec ± 5.5, respectively; P = .004; MBR, 1.1 msec ± 8.08). Conclusion This three-dimensional cardiac blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI approach overcame key limitations associated with conventional cardiac BOLD MRI by enabling whole-heart coverage within the standard duration of adenosine infusion, and increased the magnitude and reliability of BOLD contrast, which may be performed without requiring breath holds. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Almeida in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32096705      PMCID: PMC7106942          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  39 in total

1.  Non-ECG-gated myocardial perfusion MRI using continuous magnetization-driven radial sampling.

Authors:  Behzad Sharif; Rohan Dharmakumar; Reza Arsanjani; Louise Thomson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.

Authors:  Robert J McDonald; Jennifer S McDonald; David F Kallmes; Mark E Jentoft; David L Murray; Kent R Thielen; Eric E Williamson; Laurence J Eckel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Effect of adenosine on heart rate variability in humans.

Authors:  G A Rongen; S C Brooks; M J Pollard; S Ando; H R Dajani; C F Notarius; J S Floras
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.124

4.  CMR imaging of edema in myocardial infarction using cine balanced steady-state free precession.

Authors:  Andreas Kumar; Nirat Beohar; Jain Mangalathu Arumana; Eric Larose; Debiao Li; Matthias G Friedrich; Rohan Dharmakumar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12

5.  High spatial and temporal resolution cardiac cine MRI from retrospective reconstruction of data acquired in real time using motion correction and resorting.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Christine H Lorenz; Christine Mancini; Andrew E Arai; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Screening and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Abdul Hakeem; Sabha Bhatti; Su Min Chang
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07

7.  Assessment of myocardial reactivity to controlled hypercapnia with free-breathing T2-prepared cardiac blood oxygen level-dependent MR imaging.

Authors:  Hsin-Jung Yang; Roya Yumul; Richard Tang; Ivan Cokic; Michael Klein; Avinash Kali; Olivia Sobczyk; Behzad Sharif; Jun Tang; Xiaoming Bi; Sotirios A Tsaftaris; Debiao Li; Antonio Hernandez Conte; Joseph A Fisher; Rohan Dharmakumar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Towards elimination of the dark-rim artifact in first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI: removing Gibbs ringing effects using optimized radial imaging.

Authors:  Behzad Sharif; Rohan Dharmakumar; Troy LaBounty; Reza Arsanjani; Chrisandra Shufelt; Louise Thomson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Myocardial oxygenation in coronary artery disease: insights from blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Jayanth R Arnold; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Paul Bhamra-Ariza; Jane M Francis; Nick Searle; Matthew D Robson; Ruairidh K Howells; Robin P Choudhury; Ornella E Rimoldi; Paolo G Camici; Adrian P Banning; Stefan Neubauer; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 3 T: reference values, influencing factors and implications.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Marcel Prothmann; Matthias A Dieringer; Ralf Wassmuth; Andreas Greiser; Carsten Schwenke; Thoralf Niendorf; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  3 in total

1.  Myocardial blood flow is the dominant factor influencing cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine stress T2.

Authors:  Jill J Weyers; Venkat Ramanan; Ahsan Javed; Jennifer Barry; Melissa Larsen; Krishna Nayak; Graham A Wright; Nilesh R Ghugre
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Myocardial Tissue Oxygenation and Microvascular Blood Volume Measurement Using a Contrast Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Imaging Model.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Dendy; Sean G Hughes; Jonathan H Soslow; Daniel E Clark; Cynthia B Paschal; John C Gore
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 10.065

Review 3.  Advances in translational imaging of the microcirculation.

Authors:  Marie Guerraty; Akanksha Bhargava; Janaka Senarathna; Asher A Mendelson; Arvind P Pathak
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.679

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.