Literature DB >> 15269574

Gynecomastia: an outcome analysis.

Irvin M Wiesman1, James A Lehman, Michael G Parker, M Devi Prasad Tantri, Douglas S Wagner, John C Pedersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gynecomastia refers to the presence of femalelike mammary glands in a male. This disorder can lead to significant psychologic stress and self-consciousness. This study consists of a chart review of 174 patients treated surgically between July 1, 1976, and February 27, 2001.
RESULTS: Operative procedures were excision, excision with suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL), SAL, skin excision (skin) and skin excision with SAL. Overall complication rate was 20%. No significant difference in complication rates was found between grades or procedures. Revision rates between grades were I = 10.3%, II = 14.5% and III = 34.8% (P < 0.001). In grade III, gynecomastia revision rates for excision +/- SAL was 29% and skin +/- SAL was 38.1% (P = 0.644). Of the 8 revisions in the skin-sparing procedures, 6 were revised with a scar-forming procedure. Therefore, 77% of patients with grade III gynecomastia were adequately treated with a skin-sparing procedure.
CONCLUSION: Skin-sparing operations should be the initial procedure chosen for most grade III gynecomastia patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15269574     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000116256.01831.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  10 in total

1.  Patients Decision-Making Characteristics Affects Gynecomastia Treatment Satisfaction: A Multicenter Study Using the BODY-Q Chest Module.

Authors:  Mads Gustaf Jørgensen; Bu Youn Cho; Frederik Gulmark Hansen; Volker-Jürgen Schmidt; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Navid Mohamadpour Toyserkani
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  A 16-year-old male with gynecomastia and ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Henry L Chang; Joshua B Kish; Barbara L Smith; Allan M Goldstein
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Surgical management of gynecomastia--a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  A E Handschin; D Bietry; R Hüsler; A Banic; M Constantinescu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Cross-chest liposuction in gynaecomastia.

Authors:  Biju Murali; Sundeep Vijayaraghavan; P Kishore; Subramania Iyer; Mathew Jimmy; Mohit Sharma; George Paul; Sachin Chavare
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-01

5.  How important is "pseudogynecomastia"?

Authors:  B Venkata Ratnam
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Lymphoma presenting as gynaecomastia.

Authors:  S Mahmood; Z Sabih; D Sabih
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2011-04-01

7.  Gynaecomastia correction: A review of our experience.

Authors:  Arvind Arvind; Muhammad Adil Abbas Khan; Karthik Srinivasan; Jeremy Roberts
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01

8.  Gynecomastia Management: An Evolution and Refinement in Technique at UT Southwestern Medical Center.

Authors:  Steven H Bailey; Dax Guenther; Fadi Constantine; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-13

9.  Successful Excision of Gynecomastia with Nipple Repositioning Technique Utilizing the Dermoglandular Flap.

Authors:  Sadrollah Motamed; Seyed Esmail Hassanpour; Seyed Mehdi Moosavizadeh; Ataollah Heidari; Abdoreza Rouientan; Mahmood Nazemian
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07

10.  Surgical Management of Gynecomastia: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stephanie W Holzmer; Priya G Lewis; Mark J Landau; Michael E Hill
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.