Literature DB >> 15268736

Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of different methods for the detection of human cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation.

Daniel Seehofer1, Helga Meisel, Nada Rayes, Angela Stein, Jan M Langrehr, Utz Settmacher, Peter Neuhaus.   

Abstract

Standardized human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) assays were prospectively evaluated to predict HCMV disease. In 135 consecutive adult liver transplantations, pp65-antigenemia, quantitative HCMV-DNA and qualitative pp67-messenger-RNA were determined weekly. No ganciclovir prophylaxis or preemptive treatment was used. One hundred and ten (81.5%) patients showed no HCMV-infection, 25 patients were positive in at least one of the HCMV-tests (18.5%). Four suffered from HCMV viral syndrome (3.0%) and another four from tissue invasive disease. In total, pp65-antigenemia was detected in 18, HCMV-DNA in 22 and pp67-mRNA in 18 patients. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for HCMV-disease was 100% for all tests. The PPV for symptomatic HCMV-infection was 47% for pp67 mRNA. In contrast, the PPV of pp65-antigenemia (using a threshold of > 2/200 000 cells) and quantitative PCR (using a cutoff of > 5000 copies/mL) were 80% and 89%, respectively. A cost analysis revealed symptom-triggered or preemptive treatment was less expensive than general ganciclovir prophylaxis, if the incidence of CMV disease was low (<30%). Quantitative human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-DNA and pp65-antigen assays have a comparable sensitivity and can therefore predict the onset of HCMV symptoms at an early stage. Compared with general prophylaxis, symptom-triggered or preemptive treatment based on one of these assays might reduce the costs and also the danger of ganciclovir resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15268736     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of reverse transcription-PCR for detection of cytomegalovirus pp67 in samples from solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ursula Meyer-Koenig; Ilona Romberg; Kerstin Schneider; Manfred Weidmann; Winfried V Kern; Frank T Hufert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The role of the cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay in the detection and prevention of cytomegalovirus syndrome and disease in solid organ transplant recipients: A review of the British Columbia experience.

Authors:  Erica D Greanya; Nilufar Partovi; Eric M Yoshida; R Jean Shapiro; Robert D Levy; Chris H Sherlock; Gwen M Stephens
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Overview of the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  S A Ross; Z Novak; S Pati; S B Boppana
Journal:  Infect Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2011-10

4.  Prevention and Management of CMV Infections after Liver Transplantation: Current Practice in German Transplant Centers.

Authors:  Cornelius Engelmann; Martina Sterneck; Karl Heinz Weiss; Silke Templin; Steffen Zopf; Gerald Denk; Dennis Eurich; Johann Pratschke; Johannes Weiss; Felix Braun; Martin-Walter Welker; Tim Zimmermann; Petra Knipper; Dirk Nierhoff; Thomas Lorf; Elmar Jäckel; Hans-Michael Hau; Tung Yu Tsui; Aristoteles Perrakis; Hans-Jürgen Schlitt; Kerstin Herzer; Frank Tacke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Cytomegalovirus Hepatitis in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Hosts.

Authors:  Teresa Da Cunha; George Y Wu
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  Relationship between pp65 antigenemia levels and real-time quantitative DNA PCR for Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) management in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Elisabetta Cariani; Caterina P Pollara; Barbara Valloncini; Francesca Perandin; Carlo Bonfanti; Nino Manca
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.