Literature DB >> 15267702

A growing string method for determining transition states: comparison to the nudged elastic band and string methods.

Baron Peters1, Andreas Heyden, Alexis T Bell, Arup Chakraborty.   

Abstract

Interpolation methods such as the nudged elastic band and string methods are widely used for calculating minimum energy pathways and transition states for chemical reactions. Both methods require an initial guess for the reaction pathway. A poorly chosen initial guess can cause slow convergence, convergence to an incorrect pathway, or even failed electronic structure force calculations along the guessed pathway. This paper presents a growing string method that can find minimum energy pathways and transition states without the requirement of an initial guess for the pathway. The growing string begins as two string fragments, one associated with the reactants and the other with the products. Each string fragment is grown separately until the fragments converge. Once the two fragments join, the full string moves toward the minimum energy pathway according to the algorithm for the string method. This paper compares the growing string method to the string method and to the nudged elastic band method using the alanine dipeptide rearrangement as an example. In this example, for which the linearly interpolated guess is far from the minimum energy pathway, the growing string method finds the saddle point with significantly fewer electronic structure force calculations than the string method or the nudged elastic band method. Copyright 2004 American Institute of Physics

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15267702     DOI: 10.1063/1.1691018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  18 in total

1.  Learning to predict chemical reactions.

Authors:  Matthew A Kayala; Chloé-Agathe Azencott; Jonathan H Chen; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Exploration of effective potential landscapes using coarse reverse integration.

Authors:  Thomas A Frewen; Gerhard Hummer; Ioannis G Kevrekidis
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Conformational transition paths harbor structures useful for aiding drug discovery and understanding enzymatic mechanisms in protein kinases.

Authors:  Chung F Wong
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Simulating rare events using a weighted ensemble-based string method.

Authors:  Joshua L Adelman; Michael Grabe
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Intrinsic Free Energy of the Conformational Transition of the KcsA Signature Peptide from Conducting to Nonconducting State.

Authors:  Ilja V Khavrutskii; Mikolai Fajer; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Rock climbing: A local-global algorithm to compute minimum energy and minimum free energy pathways.

Authors:  Clark Templeton; Szu-Hua Chen; Arman Fathizadeh; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Discovery of conical intersection mediated photochemistry with growing string methods.

Authors:  Cody Aldaz; Joshua A Kammeraad; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Comparison of Three Chain-of-States Methods: Nudged Elastic Band and Replica Path with Restraints or Constraints.

Authors:  Peng Tao; Milan Hodošček; Joseph D Larkin; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  PyCPR - a python-based implementation of the Conjugate Peak Refinement (CPR) algorithm for finding transition state structures.

Authors:  Florian J Gisdon; Martin Culka; G Matthias Ullmann
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.