Literature DB >> 15264975

Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: consideration of future consequences.

Sheina Orbell1, Marco Perugini, Tim Rakow.   

Abstract

There are reliable individual differences in the extent to which people consider the long- and short-term consequences of their behaviors. Such differences, assessed by the Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC) Scale (A. Strathman, F. Gleicher, D. S. Boninger, & C. S. Edwards, 1994), are hypothesized to influence the impact of a persuasive communication. In an experimental study, the time frame of occurrence of positive and negative consequences of engaging in a new colorectal cancer-screening program was manipulated in a sample of two hundred twenty 50-69-year-old men and women. CFC moderated (a) the processing of short- versus long-term consequences and (b) the persuasive impact of the different communications on behavioral intentions. Low CFC individuals produced more positive thoughts and were more persuaded when positive consequences were short term and negative consequences were long term. The opposite was true for high CFC individuals. Copyright 2004 American Psychological Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15264975     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  15 in total

1.  Spontaneous reactions to health risk feedback: a network perspective.

Authors:  Martina Panzer; Britta Renner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-02-18

2.  A Field Experiment Testing the Utility of Regulatory Fit Messages for Promoting Physical Activity.

Authors:  Amy E Latimer; Susan E Rivers; Tara A Rench; Nicole A Katulak; Althea Hicks; Julie Keany Hodorowski; E Tory Higgins; Peter Salovey
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

3.  Forgiveness and consideration of future consequences in aggressive driving.

Authors:  Michael Moore; Eric R Dahlen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2008-06-20

4.  Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples.

Authors:  Rachel A Crockett; John Weinman; Matthew Hankins; Theresa Marteau
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-03

5.  Time perspective and smoking, obesity, and exercise in a community sample.

Authors:  Lori C Guthrie; Kristen Lessl; Onyinyechukwu Ochi; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2013-03

6.  Parental Support for HPV Vaccination Mandates Among African Americans: The Impact of Message Framing and Consideration of Future Consequences.

Authors:  Xiaoli Nan; Kelly Daily; Adam Richards; Cheryl Holt
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-07-06

7.  Towards an effective health interventions design: an extension of the health belief model.

Authors:  Rita Orji; Julita Vassileva; Regan Mandryk
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2012-12-19

8.  Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Anna Good; Samuel G Smith; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.

Authors:  Rachel Crockett; Timothy M Wilkinson; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06-28

10.  Non- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Steve Halligan; Andrew Plumb; Darren Boone; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.