Literature DB >> 15264653

Elemental composition of brazing alloys in metallic orthodontic brackets.

Spiros Zinelis1, Olga Annousaki, Theodore Eliades, Margarita Makou.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the elemental composition of the brazing alloy of representative orthodontic brackets. The brackets examined were Gemini (3M, Unitec, Monrovia, Calif), MicroLoc (GAC, Bohemia, NY), OptiMESHxrt (Ormco, Glendora, Calif), and Ultratrim (Dentarum, Ispringen, Germany). Four metallic brackets for each brand were embedded in epoxy resin and after metallographic grinding and polishing were cleaned in a water ultrasonic bath. Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis (EDS) were used to assess the quantitative composition of the brazing alloy. Four EDS spectra were collected for each brazing alloy, and the mean value and standard deviation for the concentration of each element were calculated. The elemental composition of the brazing alloys was determined as follows (percent weight): Gemini: Ni = 83.98 +/- 1.02, Si = 6.46 +/- 0.37, Fe = 5.90 +/- 0.93, Cr = 3.52 +/- 0.34; MicroLoc: Ag = 42.82 +/- 0.18, Au = 32.14 +/- 0.65, Cu = 24.53 +/- 0.26, Mg = 1.12 +/- 0.33; OptiMESHxrt: Au = 67.79 +/- 0.97, Fe = 15.69 +/- 0.29, Ni = 13.01 +/- 0.93, Cr = 4.01 +/- 0.35; Ultratrim: Ag = 87.97 +/- 0.33, Cu = 10.51 +/- 0.45, Mg = 1.29 +/- 0.63, Zn = 1.13 +/- 0.24. The findings of this study showed that different brazing materials were used for the different brands, and thus different performances are expected during intraoral exposure; potential effects on the biological properties also are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15264653     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0394:ECOBAI>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

1.  Galvanic coupling of steel and gold alloy lingual brackets with orthodontic wires: Is corrosion a concern?

Authors:  Georgios Polychronis; Youssef S Al Jabbari; Theodore Eliades; Spiros Zinelis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Corrosion behavior of self-ligating and conventional metal brackets.

Authors:  Lúcio Henrique Esmeraldo Gurgel Maia; Hibernon Lopes Filho; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Mônica Tirre de Souza Araújo; Delmo Santiago Vaitsman
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

3.  Are torque values of preadjusted brackets precise?

Authors:  Alessandra Motta Streva; Flávio Augusto Cotrim-Ferreira; Daniela Gamba Garib; Paulo Eduardo Guedes Carvalho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Assessment of the hardness of different orthodontic wires and brackets produced by metal injection molding and conventional methods.

Authors:  Shiva Alavi; Marzie Kachuie
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

5.  Torque differences due to the material variation of the orthodontic appliance: a finite element study.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic; Theodore Eliades; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  In Vitro Determination of Genotoxicity Induced by Brackets Alloys in Cultures of Human Gingival Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Loyola-Rodríguez; Ildelfonso Lastra-Corso; José Obed García-Cortés; Alejandra Loyola-Leyva; Rúben Abraham Domínguez-Pérez; David Avila-Arizmendi; Guillermo Contreras-Palma; Cecilia González-Calixto
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2020-08-27

7.  Retrieval analysis of different orthodontic brackets: the applicability of electron microprobe techniques for determining material heterogeneities and corrosive potential.

Authors:  Alexandra Ioana Holst; Stefan Holst; Ursula Hirschfelder; Volker Von Seckendorff
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.