Literature DB >> 15261872

A comparison between derivation optimization and Cz'-FPz for posterior tibial P37 somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring.

D B MacDonald1, B Stigsby, Z Al Zayed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare P37 derivation optimization to Cz'-FPz.
METHODS: After induction in 120 patients, monitoring derivations optimized by mapping FPz, Cz, Cz', Pz, C4', C2', C1' and C3'-mastoid to determine the P37 and N37 maximums for use as inputs 1 and 2 were compared to Cz'-FPz. This was repeated later in 35 surgeries.
RESULTS: Eleven optimal derivations occurred and usually differed between sides. Input 1 was Cz', Pz, Cz, iCi', or Ci' and input 2 was Cc', FPz, Ci' or Pz. Even the most frequent Cz'-Cc' derivation was optimal for both sides of an individual in only 17% and this was true for Cz'-FPz in only 4%. Optimization produced higher amplitudes than Cz'-FPz (P<0.001). The ratio was [squareroot of 2] : 1 in 61% of patients and > or =2:1 in 28%, approximately halving or quartering averaging times. Optimization assessed decussation, disclosing non-decussation in one patient while Cz'-FPz did not. Alterations of P37 topography that reduced initially optimal derivation amplitude and made a different derivation optimal were demonstrated by repeat optimization in 13 of 35 patients, preventing misinterpretation in one. While also affected, Cz'-FPz neither detected nor adjusted for potentially misleading topographic changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher amplitudes, decussation assessment and topographic adjustment make P37 derivation optimization superior to Cz'-FPz for monitoring this highly variable potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15261872     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  4 in total

1.  Alternative anterior reference sites for measuring posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  John F Bebawy; Dhanesh K Gupta; Matthew A Cotton; Katherine S Gil; Edward B Fohrman; Srdjan Mirkovic; Antoun Koht
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Functional features of crossmodal mismatch responses.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Elia Valentini; Li Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Four-limb muscle motor evoked potential and optimized somatosensory evoked potential monitoring with decussation assessment: results in 206 thoracolumbar spine surgeries.

Authors:  David B Macdonald; Zayed Al Zayed; Abdulmoneam Al Saddigi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  SEP Montage Variability Comparison during Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Christine Hanson; Athena Maria Lolis; Aleksandar Beric
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.