BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation in rats is technically difficult and results may vary. The non-suture cuff technique (non-suture [NS]), which involves using a cuff for anastomoses of vessels and airways, is commonly utilized to perform transplant procedures. However, the standard bronchial cuff may occlude the lumen, resulting in diminished graft survival. In contrast, the non-suture cuff technique for vascular anastomoses with bronchial suturing (bronchial suture [BS]), although more technically difficult, is known to have prolonged bronchial patency. We developed a "modified" NS technique that uses a larger and longer cuff for anastomoses and compared the efficacy of this procedure to the BS technique for lung transplantation. METHODS: The BS procedure was performed in 146 transplant procedures. The modified NS procedure, which uses a larger cuff than the standard NS procedure, was performed in 113 procedures. RESULTS: Although total ischemic times were comparable, the total operation time in the NS group was significantly shorter than in the BS group (p < 0.0001). Bronchial leakage occurred in 9.6% of BS group patients and 0% of NS group patients. Survival rates were comparable between groups. Although the BS technique is widely acknowledged to provide prolonged patency of bronchial anastomosis, graft survival in the NS group was observed up 17 months post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the NS technique, which is less technically difficult, results in shorter operative times compared with the BS procedure, and results in durable anastomoses of lung grafts.
BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation in rats is technically difficult and results may vary. The non-suture cuff technique (non-suture [NS]), which involves using a cuff for anastomoses of vessels and airways, is commonly utilized to perform transplant procedures. However, the standard bronchial cuff may occlude the lumen, resulting in diminished graft survival. In contrast, the non-suture cuff technique for vascular anastomoses with bronchial suturing (bronchial suture [BS]), although more technically difficult, is known to have prolonged bronchial patency. We developed a "modified" NS technique that uses a larger and longer cuff for anastomoses and compared the efficacy of this procedure to the BS technique for lung transplantation. METHODS: The BS procedure was performed in 146 transplant procedures. The modified NS procedure, which uses a larger cuff than the standard NS procedure, was performed in 113 procedures. RESULTS: Although total ischemic times were comparable, the total operation time in the NS group was significantly shorter than in the BS group (p < 0.0001). Bronchial leakage occurred in 9.6% of BS group patients and 0% of NS group patients. Survival rates were comparable between groups. Although the BS technique is widely acknowledged to provide prolonged patency of bronchial anastomosis, graft survival in the NS group was observed up 17 months post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the NS technique, which is less technically difficult, results in shorter operative times compared with the BS procedure, and results in durable anastomoses of lung grafts.
Authors: Sarah E Gilpin; Xi Ren; Tatsuya Okamoto; Jacques P Guyette; Hongmei Mou; Jayaraj Rajagopal; Douglas J Mathisen; Joseph P Vacanti; Harald C Ott Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ruedi K Braun; Melanie Molitor-Dart; Christopher Wigfield; Zhuzai Xiang; Sean B Fain; Ewa Jankowska-Gan; Christine M Seroogy; William J Burlingham; David S Wilkes; David D Brand; Jose Torrealba; Robert B Love Journal: Transplantation Date: 2009-12-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: J-C Chang; J H Leung; T Tang; M G Hartwig; Z E Holzknecht; W Parker; R D Davis; S S Lin Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: B Li; M G Hartwig; J Z Appel; E L Bush; K R Balsara; Z E Holzknecht; B H Collins; D N Howell; W Parker; S S Lin; R D Davis Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2008-06-28 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Xin Jin; Janne Kaes; Jan Van Slambrouck; Ilhan Inci; Stephan Arni; Vincent Geudens; Tobias Heigl; Yanina Jansen; Marianne S Carlon; Robin Vos; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Yi Zhang; Bart M Vanaudenaerde; Laurens J Ceulemans Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-30 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Stephan Umkehrer; Carmela Morrone; Julien Dinkel; Laura Aigner; Maximilian F Reiser; Julia Herzen; Ali Ö Yildirim; Franz Pfeiffer; Katharina Hellbach Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 4.379