Literature DB >> 15259683

HIS/RIS/PACS integration: getting to the gold standard.

Stephen S Boochever1.   

Abstract

The technology for acquiring, storing, retrieving, displaying, and distributing images has advanced dramatically in recent years. The push is toward enterprise-wide image management solutions, where digital images from radiology, cardiology, and other "ologies" are seamlessly linked with information from clinical information systems and other databases, and they are accessed seamlessly from a single point of end-user interaction. The "gold standard" of system integration would provide the platform for improved workflow, patient throughput and patient safety, as well as decreased cost. Unfortunately, the gold standard remains elusive in most healthcare environments, even those with new systems. One of the earliest issues that plagued the progress of hospital information system/radiology information systems/picture archiving and communication systems (HIS/RIS/PACS) integration was a matter of language between Health Level-7 (HL7) and DICOM. This barrier was solved by the broker--a software and hardware device that accepts HL7 messages from the RIS then translates, or maps, the data to produce DICOM messages for transmission to the PACS. Technologist workflow requires patient and exam information from the RIS to flow to the modality. The broker provides support for this by taking advantage of the DICOM Modality Worklist (DMWL). Two primary problems are inherent in most brokered configurations. Workflow is driven by paper, and RIS information flows in 1 direction only, which leads to duplicative databases. Overcoming the limitations of HIS/RIS/PACS connectivity requires industry accepted communication protocols/rules. To facilitate this, the Integrating the Health Care Enterprise (IHE) initiative was developed. The goal of IHE is to provide end-users improved access to critical patient and clinical information across all systems within the healthcare delivery network. While the IHE initiative began to facilitate more efficient, predictable, and functional integration between disparate systems, vendors still had technology hurdles to overcome. System integration continues to be significantly hampered, not by technology limitations, but instead by business and political issues. In response to these challenges, several vendors have begun to offer consolidated RIS/PACS solutions and/or HIS/RIS/PACS solutions. Consequently, the prospect of the gold standard appears to be on the horizon. Single vendor consolidated systems are not, however, feasible for deployment in many healthcare organizations, and they are not necessarily the panacea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15259683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Manage        ISSN: 0198-7097


  17 in total

1.  Empirical investigation of radiologists' priorities for PACS selection: an analytical hierarchy process approach.

Authors:  Vivek Joshi; Kyootai Lee; David Melson; Vamsi R Narra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  IT services in a completely digitized radiological department: value and benefit of an in-house departmental IT group.

Authors:  M Treitl; S Wirth; A Lucke; S Villain; J Rieger; K J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Possibilities for workflow optimization in radiology departments beyond RIS and PACS].

Authors:  M Treitl; S Wirth; A Lucke; S Nissen-Meyer; S Villain; C Trumm; J Rieger; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  The impact of PACS on radiologists' work practice.

Authors:  Kent Fridell; Lars Edgren; Lars Lindsköld; Peter Aspelin; Nina Lundberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Enterprise imaging and multi-departmental PACS.

Authors:  Björn Bergh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A knowledge-anchored integrative image search and retrieval system.

Authors:  Selnur Erdal; Umit V Catalyurek; Philip R O Payne; Joel Saltz; Jyoti Kamal; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  A filmless radiology teaching conference system for pertinent displaying and image searching.

Authors:  Katsumi Abe; Mitsuhiro Narata; Ikue Tanaka; Motoichiro Takahashi; Akihito Igarashi; Takahiro Sasaki; Kazuya Matsuyama; Naokaz Tohi; Shigeru Kosuda
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Indications, imaging technique, and reading of cardiac computed tomography: survey of clinical practice.

Authors:  M H Maurer; E Zimmermann; P Schlattmann; C Germershausen; B Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Domain Modeling and Application Development of an Archetype- and XML-based EHRS. Practical Experiences and Lessons Learnt.

Authors:  Stefan Kropf; Claire Chalopin; Dirk Lindner; Kerstin Denecke
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.