Literature DB >> 15258134

Modeling airway resistance dynamics after tidal and deep inspirations.

C William Thorpe1, Cheryl M Salome, Norbert Berend, Gregory G King.   

Abstract

Using the forced oscillation technique, we tracked airway resistance continuously during quiet breathing (QB) and deep inspiration (DI), thus observing fluctuations in resistance that may reflect mechanisms of airway stretch and renarrowing. After DI, however, the resistance may be depressed for a period not related to volume changes. We hypothesized that this gradual increase in resistance after DI-induced dilation was determined by a simple time constant. Furthermore, to the extent that this effect reflects dynamic characteristics of airway renarrowing, the resistance change after each tidal inspiration should also be constrained by this temporal limit. A model relating resistance fluctuations to the breathing pattern, including both instantaneous and delayed effects, was developed and applied to data from 14 nonasthmatic and 17 asthmatic subjects (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 103 +/- 13 and 83 +/- 12%, respectively, means +/- SD) after methacholine challenge (dose 145 +/- 80 and 3.0 +/- 3.4 micromol, respectively) that resulted in respective forced expiratory volume in 1 s reductions of 16 +/- 7 and 24 +/- 6% from baseline. Resistance was measured continuously for 1 min of QB, a DI, followed by a further minute of QB. Resistance values at end expiration (Ree) and end inspiration were calculated. We found that the sequence of Ree after DI was best modeled by a power-law function of time rather than an exponential decay (r2 = 0.82 +/- 0.18 compared with 0.63 +/- 0.16; P < 0.01). Furthermore, the coefficient characterizing this "renarrowing function" was close to equal to the coefficient characterizing the equivalent function of resistance change between each resistance value at end inpiration and subsequent Ree during QB, particularly in the nonasthmatic subjects for whom the intraclass correlation was 0.66. This suggests that the same time-dependent factors determine renarrowing after both large and small breaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15258134     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01300.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  13 in total

Review 1.  Airway smooth muscle and bronchospasm: fluctuating, fluidizing, freezing.

Authors:  Ramaswamy Krishnan; Xavier Trepat; Trang T B Nguyen; Guillaume Lenormand; Madavi Oliver; Jeffrey J Fredberg
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 1.931

2.  Discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro comparisons of forced oscillation devices.

Authors:  Sabine C Zimmermann; Joanna C Watts; Amy Bertolin; Kanika Jetmalani; Gregory G King; Cindy Thamrin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Dynamic airway constriction in rats: heterogeneity and response to deep inspiration.

Authors:  Thien-Khoi N Phung; Scott E Sinclair; Patrudu Makena; Robert C Molthen; Christopher M Waters
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.464

4.  Discordant Spirometry and Impulse Oscillometry Assessments in the Diagnosis of Small Airway Dysfunction.

Authors:  Lifei Lu; Jieqi Peng; Ningning Zhao; Fan Wu; Heshen Tian; Huajing Yang; Zhishan Deng; Zihui Wang; Shan Xiao; Xiang Wen; Youlan Zheng; Cuiqiong Dai; Xiaohui Wu; Kunning Zhou; Pixin Ran; Yumin Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  Airway smooth muscle dynamics: a common pathway of airway obstruction in asthma.

Authors:  S S An; T R Bai; J H T Bates; J L Black; R H Brown; V Brusasco; P Chitano; L Deng; M Dowell; D H Eidelman; B Fabry; N J Fairbank; L E Ford; J J Fredberg; W T Gerthoffer; S H Gilbert; R Gosens; S J Gunst; A J Halayko; R H Ingram; C G Irvin; A L James; L J Janssen; G G King; D A Knight; A M Lauzon; O J Lakser; M S Ludwig; K R Lutchen; G N Maksym; J G Martin; T Mauad; B E McParland; S M Mijailovich; H W Mitchell; R W Mitchell; W Mitzner; T M Murphy; P D Paré; R Pellegrino; M J Sanderson; R R Schellenberg; C Y Seow; P S P Silveira; P G Smith; J Solway; N L Stephens; P J Sterk; A G Stewart; D D Tang; R S Tepper; T Tran; L Wang
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 6.  Respiratory impedance measurements for assessment of lung mechanics: focus on asthma.

Authors:  Adam S LaPrad; Kenneth R Lutchen
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 1.931

7.  Total inspiratory and expiratory impedance in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Karla Kristine Dames Silva; Agnaldo José Lopes; José Manoel Jansen; Pedro Lopes de Melo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Airway response to methacholine following eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea in athletes.

Authors:  Valérie Bougault; Evelyne Blouin; Julie Turmel; Louis-Philippe Boulet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Within-breath analysis of respiratory mechanics in asthmatic patients by forced oscillation.

Authors:  Juliana Veiga; Agnaldo José Lopes; José Manoel Jansen; Pedro Lopes de Melo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Ultrafine Particles from Traffic Emissions and Children's Health (UPTECH) in Brisbane, Queensland (Australia): study design and implementation.

Authors:  Wafaa Nabil Ezz; Mandana Mazaheri; Paul Robinson; Graham R Johnson; Samuel Clifford; Congrong He; Lidia Morawska; Guy B Marks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.