| Literature DB >> 31017015 |
Thien-Khoi N Phung1, Scott E Sinclair1,2, Patrudu Makena2, Robert C Molthen3, Christopher M Waters1,2,4.
Abstract
Airway narrowing due to hyperresponsiveness severely limits gas exchange in patients with asthma. Imaging studies in humans and animals have shown that bronchoconstriction causes patchy patterns of ventilation defects throughout the lungs, and several computational models have predicted that these regions are due to constriction of smaller airways. However, these imaging approaches are often limited in their ability to capture dynamic changes in small airways, and the patterns of constriction are heterogeneous. To directly investigate regional variations in airway narrowing and the response to deep inspirations (DIs), we utilized tantalum dust and microfocal X-ray imaging of rat lungs to obtain dynamic images of airways in an intact animal model. Airway resistance was simultaneously measured using the flexiVent system. Custom-developed software was used to track changes in airway diameters up to generation 19 (~0.3-3 mm). Changes in diameter during bronchoconstriction were then measured in response to methacholine (MCh) challenge. In contrast with the model predictions, we observed significantly greater percent constriction in larger airways in response to MCh challenge. Although there was a dose-dependent increase in total respiratory resistance with MCh, the percent change in airway diameters was similar for increasing doses. A single DI following MCh caused a significant reduction in resistance but did not cause a significant increase in airway diameters. Multiple DIs did, however, cause significant increases in airway diameters. These measurements allowed us to directly quantify dynamic changes in airways during bronchoconstriction and demonstrated greater constriction in larger airways.Entities:
Keywords: asthma; bronchoconstriction; deep inspiration; methacholine challenge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31017015 PMCID: PMC6689744 DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00050.2019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol ISSN: 1040-0605 Impact factor: 5.464