Literature DB >> 15258127

Assessment of low-frequency fatigue with two methods of electrical stimulation.

V Martin1, G Y Millet, A Martin, G Deley, G Lattier.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the use of transcutaneous vs. motor nerve stimulation in the evaluation of low-frequency fatigue. Nine female and eleven male subjects, all physically active, performed a 30-min downhill run on a motorized treadmill. Knee extensor muscle contractile characteristics were measured before, immediately after (Post), and 30 min after the fatiguing exercise (Post30) by using single twitches and 0.5-s tetani at 20 Hz (P20) and 80 Hz (P80). The P20-to-P80 ratio was calculated. Electrical stimulations were randomly applied either maximally to the femoral nerve or via large surface electrodes (ES) at an intensity sufficient to evoke 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) during a 80-Hz tetanus. Voluntary activation level was also determined during isometric MVC by the twitch-interpolation technique. Knee extensor MVC and voluntary activation level decreased at all points in time postexercise (P < 0.001). P20 and P80 displayed significant time x gender x stimulation method interactions (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Both stimulation methods detected significant torque reductions at Post and Post30. Overall, ES tended to detect a greater impairment at Post in male and a lesser one in female subjects at both Post and Post30. Interestingly, the P20-P80 ratio relative decrease did not differ between the two methods of stimulation. The low-to-high frequency ratio only demonstrated a significant time effect (P < 0.001). It can be concluded that low-frequency fatigue due to eccentric exercise appears to be accurately assessable by ES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15258127     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00376.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  37 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Prefrontal cortex oxygenation and neuromuscular responses to exhaustive exercise.

Authors:  Thomas Rupp; Rupp Thomas; Stéphane Perrey; Perrey Stephane
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Neural and muscular changes to detraining after electrostimulation training.

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Marie Guette; Yves Ballay; Alain Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Muscle mechanical characteristics in fatigue and recovery from a marathon race in highly trained runners.

Authors:  Kim Petersen; Claus Bugge Hansen; Per Aagaard; Klavs Madsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Magnetic versus electrical stimulation in the interpolation twitch technique of elbow flexors.

Authors:  Sofia I Lampropoulou; Alexander V Nowicky; Louise Marston
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Plantar flexor muscle-tendon unit length and stiffness do not influence neuromuscular fatigue in boys and men.

Authors:  Enzo Piponnier; Sébastien Ratel; Emeric Chalchat; Kévin Jagot; Bastien Bontemps; Valérie Julian; Olivia Bocock; Martine Duclos; Vincent Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Improved tolerance of peripheral fatigue by the central nervous system after endurance training.

Authors:  F Zghal; F Cottin; I Kenoun; H Rebaï; W Moalla; M Dogui; Z Tabka; V Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Comparison of electrical nerve stimulation, electrical muscle stimulation and magnetic nerve stimulation to assess the neuromuscular function of the plantar flexor muscles.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; John Temesi; Guillaume Y Millet; Samuel Verges; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underpinning Stretch-Induced Force Loss.

Authors:  Gabriel S Trajano; Kazunori Nosaka; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  The development of peripheral fatigue and short-term recovery during self-paced high-intensity exercise.

Authors:  Christian Froyd; Guillaume Y Millet; Timothy D Noakes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.