PURPOSE: The goal of this work is to describe psychometric properties of two scales measuring perceived stigma in children with epilepsy and their parents. METHODS: Data were collected for the parent scale in two samples: parents of 173 children with epilepsy and of 224 children with new-onset seizures. The child scale was tested in the chronic sample. Content validity, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity were tested. RESULTS: Both scales had strong internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Higher scores were associated with greater seizure severity scores. In the parent scale, lower scores were associated with more positive mood, less worry, and more family leisure activities. In the child scale, higher scores were correlated with more negative attitude, greater worry, poorer self-concept, and more depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Both scales were found to have strong psychometric properties. They are short, and items are easy to understand. These scales have potential for use in research and in the clinical setting to measure stigma.
PURPOSE: The goal of this work is to describe psychometric properties of two scales measuring perceived stigma in children with epilepsy and their parents. METHODS: Data were collected for the parent scale in two samples: parents of 173 children with epilepsy and of 224 children with new-onset seizures. The child scale was tested in the chronic sample. Content validity, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity were tested. RESULTS: Both scales had strong internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Higher scores were associated with greater seizure severity scores. In the parent scale, lower scores were associated with more positive mood, less worry, and more family leisure activities. In the child scale, higher scores were correlated with more negative attitude, greater worry, poorer self-concept, and more depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Both scales were found to have strong psychometric properties. They are short, and items are easy to understand. These scales have potential for use in research and in the clinical setting to measure stigma.
Authors: Melissa A Elafros; Claire Sakubita-Simasiku; Masharip Atadzhanov; Alan Haworth; Elwyn Chomba; Gretchen L Birbeck Journal: Int Health Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: David Cordova; Jose Ruben Parra-Cardona; Adrian Blow; Deborah J Johnson; Guillermo Prado; Hiram E Fitzgerald Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Joan K Austin; Cheryl P Shore; David W Dunn; Cynthia S Johnson; Janice M Buelow; Susan M Perkins Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 2.937