Literature DB >> 15255260

Bifurcation geometry and the presence of cerebral artery aneurysms.

Tor Ingebrigtsen1, Michael K Morgan, Ken Faulder, Linda Ingebrigtsen, Trygve Sparr, Henrik Schirmer.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The angles of arterial bifurcations are governed by principles of work minimization (optimality principle). This determines the relationship between the angle of a bifurcation and the radii of the vessels. Nevertheless, the model is predicated on an absence of significant communication between these branches. The circle of Willis changes this relationship because the vessels proximal to the ring of vessels have additional factors that determine work minimization compared with more distal branches. This must have an impact on understanding of the relationship between shear stress and aneurysm formation. The authors hypothesized that normal bifurcations of cerebral arteries beyond the circle of Willis would follow optimality principles of minimum work and that the presence of aneurysms would be associated with deviations from optimum bifurcation geometry. Nevertheless, the vessels participating in (or immediately proximal to) the circle of Willis may not follow the geometric model as it is generally applied and this must also be investigated.
METHODS: One hundred seven bifurcations of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), distal internal carotid artery (ICA), and basilar artery (BA) were studied in 55 patients. The authors analyzed three-dimensional reconstructions of digital subtraction angiography images with respect to vessel radii and bifurcation angles. The junction exponent (that is, a calculated measure of the division of flow at the bifurcation) and the difference between the predicted optimal and observed branch angles were used as measures of deviation from the geometry thought best to minimize work. The mean junction exponent for MCA bifurcations was 2.9 +/- 1.2 (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]), which is close to the theoretical optimum of 3, but it was significantly smaller (p < 0.001; 1.7 +/- 0.8, mean +/- SD) for distal ICA bifurcations. In a multilevel multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the observed branch angles were significant independent predictors for the presence of an aneurysm. The odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval) for the presence of an aneurysm was 3.46 (1.02-11.74) between the lowest and highest tertile of the observed angle between the parent vessel and the largest branch. The corresponding OR for the smallest branch was 48.06 (9.7-238.2).
CONCLUSIONS: The bifurcation beyond the circle of Willis (that is, the MCA) closely approximated optimality principles, whereas the bifurcations within the circle of Willis (that is, the distal ICA and BA) did not. This indicates that the confluence of hemodynamic forces plays an important role in the distribution of work at bifurcations within the circle of Willis. In addition, the observed branch angles were predictors for the presence of aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255260     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  30 in total

1.  Hemodynamics and anatomy of elastase-induced rabbit aneurysm models: similarity to human cerebral aneurysms?

Authors:  Z Zeng; D F Kallmes; M J Durka; Y Ding; D Lewis; R Kadirvel; A M Robertson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  The genetics of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Boris Krischek; Ituro Inoue
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  The effect of basilar artery bifurcation angle on rates of initial occlusion, recanalization, and retreatment of basilar artery apex aneurysms following coil embolization.

Authors:  Christopher J Stapleton; Jay I Kumar; Brian P Walcott; Collin M Torok; Pankaj K Agarwalla; Matthew J Koch; Aman B Patel
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Better Than Nothing: A Rational Approach for Minimizing the Impact of Outflow Strategy on Cerebrovascular Simulations.

Authors:  C Chnafa; O Brina; V M Pereira; D A Steinman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Risk factor analysis of recanalization and retreatment for patients with endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms.

Authors:  Seung Pil Ban; Gyojun Hwang; Chang Hyeun Kim; Hyoung Soo Byoun; Si Un Lee; Tackeun Kim; Jae Seung Bang; Chang Wan Oh; O-Ki Kwon
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Does the principle of minimum work apply at the carotid bifurcation: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Richard J Beare; Gita Das; Mandy Ren; Winston Chong; Matthew D Sinnott; James E Hilton; Velandai Srikanth; Thanh G Phan
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Morphological Differences between Ruptured and Unruptured Basilar Bifurcation Aneurysms.

Authors:  Sudheer Ambekar; Venkatesh Madhugiri; Papireddy Bollam; Anil Nanda
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-01-22

9.  Internal carotid bifurcation aneurysms: frequency, angiographic anatomy and results of coiling in 50 aneurysms.

Authors:  Willem Jan van Rooij; Menno Sluzewski; Guus N Beute
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Extended monitoring of coiled aneurysms completely occluded at 6-month follow-up: late recanalization rate and related risk factors.

Authors:  Jin Pyeong Jeon; Young Dae Cho; Jong Kook Rhim; Dong Hyun Yoo; Hyun-Seung Kang; Jeong Eun Kim; Won-Sang Cho; Moon Hee Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.