Literature DB >> 15255208

Patient-specific computational analysis of transvenous defibrillation: a comparison to clinical metrics in humans.

Daniel Mocanu1, Joachim Kettenbach, Michael O Sweeney, Ron Kikinis, Bruce H Kenknight, Solomon R Eisenberg.   

Abstract

The goal of this study is to assess the predictive capacity of computational models of transvenous defibrillation by comparing the results of patient-specific simulations to clinical defibrillation thresholds (DFT). Nine patient-specific models of the thorax and in situ electrodes were created from segmented CT images taken after implantation of the cardioverter-defibrillator. The defibrillation field distribution was computed using the finite volume method. The DFTs were extracted from the calculated field distribution using the 95% critical mass criterion. The comparison between simulated and clinical DFT energy resulted in a rms difference of 12.4 J and a 0.05 correlation coefficient (cc). The model-predicted DFTs were well matched to the clinical values in four patients (rms = 1.5 J; cc = 0.84). For the remaining five patients the rms difference was 18.4 J with a cc = 0.85. These results suggest that computational models based soley on the critical mass criterion and a single value of the inexcitability threshold are not able to consistently predict DFTs for individual patients. However, inspection of the weak potential gradient field in all nine patients revealed a relationship between the degree of dispersion of the weak field and the clinical DFT, which may help identify high DFT patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255208     DOI: 10.1023/b:abme.0000030253.95538.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  2 in total

1.  Predictive modeling of defibrillation using hexahedral and tetrahedral finite element models: recent advances.

Authors:  John K Triedman; Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Dana H Brooks; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  A computer modeling tool for comparing novel ICD electrode orientations in children and adults.

Authors:  Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Steve Pieper; Rob Macleod; Dana H Brooks; Frank Cecchin; John K Triedman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 6.343

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.