Literature DB >> 15255073

Discriminative capacity of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and of osteoporosis and fracture risk factors in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fractures.

J L Hernández1, F Marin, J González-Macías, A Díez-Pérez, J Vila, S Giménez, B Galán, M S Arenas, F Suárez, L Gayola, G Guillén, T Sagredo, R Belenguer, A Moron, E Arriaza.   

Abstract

Bone fragility fractures constitute the principal complication of osteoporosis. The identification of individuals at high risk of sustaining osteoporotic fractures is important for implementing preventive measures. The purpose of this study is to analyze the discriminative capacity of a series of osteoporosis and fracture risk factors, and of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS), in a population of postmenopausal women with a history of osteoporotic fracture. A cross-sectional analysis was made of a cohort of 5195 women aged 65 or older (mean +/- SD: 72.3 +/- 5.4 years) seen in 58 primary care centers in Spain. A total of 1042 women (20.1%) presented with a history of osteoporotic fracture. Most fractures (93%) were non-vertebral. Age-adjusted odds ratios corresponding to each decrease in one standard deviation of the different QUS parameters ranged from 1.47 to 1.55 (P < 0.001) for fractures. The age-adjusted multivariate analysis yielded the following risk factors independently associated with a history of osteoporotic fracture: number of fertile years, a family history of fracture, falls in the previous year, a history of chronic obstructive airway disease, the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, and a low value for any of the QUS parameters. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the best model was 0.656. In summary, a series of easily assessable osteoporotic fracture risk factors has been identified. QUS was shown to discriminate between women with and without a history of fracture, and constitutes a useful tool for assessing fracture risk. Various of the vertebral and hip fracture risk factors frequently cited in North American and British populations showed no discriminative capacity in our series--thus suggesting that such factors may not be fully applicable to our population and/or to the predominant type of fractures included in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255073     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-003-0158-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  12 in total

1.  Osteoporosis case finding in the general practice: phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry with and without risk factors for osteoporosis to select postmenopausal women eligible for lumbar spine and hip densitometry.

Authors:  Katharina M Gasser; Christian Mueller; Marcel Zwahlen; Manfred Kaufmann; Gaby Fuchs; Romain Perrelet; Gilbert Abetel; Ulrich Bürgi; Kurt Lippuner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Increased bone fracture prevalence in postmenopausal women suffering from pollen-allergy.

Authors:  Viktoria Ferencz; Szilvia Meszaros; Emoke Csupor; Edit Toth; Katalin Bors; Andras Falus; Csaba Horvath
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prediction of absolute risk of non-spinal fractures using clinical risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  A Díez-Pérez; J González-Macías; F Marín; M Abizanda; R Alvarez; A Gimeno; E Pegenaute; J Vila
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan.

Authors:  L Vandenput; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; E Liu; K E Åkesson; F A Anderson; R Azagra; C L Bager; C Beaudart; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; E Biver; O Bruyère; J A Cauley; J R Center; R Chapurlat; C Christiansen; C Cooper; C J Crandall; S R Cummings; J A P da Silva; B Dawson-Hughes; A Diez-Perez; A B Dufour; J A Eisman; P J M Elders; S Ferrari; Y Fujita; S Fujiwara; C-C Glüer; I Goldshtein; D Goltzman; V Gudnason; J Hall; D Hans; M Hoff; R J Hollick; M Huisman; M Iki; S Ish-Shalom; G Jones; M K Karlsson; S Khosla; D P Kiel; W-P Koh; F Koromani; M A Kotowicz; H Kröger; T Kwok; O Lamy; A Langhammer; B Larijani; K Lippuner; D Mellström; T Merlijn; A Nordström; P Nordström; T W O'Neill; B Obermayer-Pietsch; C Ohlsson; E S Orwoll; J A Pasco; F Rivadeneira; B Schei; A-M Schott; E J Shiroma; K Siggeirsdottir; E M Simonsick; E Sornay-Rendu; R Sund; K M A Swart; P Szulc; J Tamaki; D J Torgerson; N M van Schoor; T P van Staa; J Vila; N J Wareham; N C Wright; N Yoshimura; M C Zillikens; M Zwart; N C Harvey; M Lorentzon; W D Leslie; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.071

6.  Measurement of human trabecular bone by novel ultrasonic bone densitometry based on fast and slow waves.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; T Otani; H Hagino; H Katagiri; T Okano; I Mano; R Teshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  An assessment of the use of quantitative ultrasound and the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians in determining the risk of nonvertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women.

Authors:  Bei Tao; Jian-min Liu; Xiao-ying Li; Ji-guang Wang; Wei-qing Wang; Guang Ning
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and mortality: a prospective study.

Authors:  J González-Macías; F Marín; J Vila; E Carrasco; P Benavides; M V Castell; J E Magaña; F Chavida; A Díez-Pérez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The risk of osteoporotic fractures and its associating risk factors according to the FRAX model in the Iranian patients: a follow-up cohort.

Authors:  Shahnaz Ghafoori; Abbasali Keshtkar; Patricia Khashayar; Mehdi Ebrahimi; Majid Ramezani; Zahra Mohammadi; Farzane Saeidifard; Nasrin Nemati; Maryam Khoshbin; Solmaz Azizian; Fatemeh Zare; Sara Shirazi; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2014-10-22

Review 10.  Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound as a determinant of bone health status: what properties of bone does it reflect?

Authors:  Kok-Yong Chin; Soelaiman Ima-Nirwana
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.