Literature DB >> 15248217

A randomized trial of parenteral methotrexate comparing an intermediate dose with a higher dose in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who failed to respond to standard doses of methotrexate.

Nicolino Ruperto1, Kevin J Murray, Valeria Gerloni, Nico Wulffraat, Sheila Knupp Feitosa de Oliveira, Fernanda Falcini, Pavla Dolezalova, Maria Alessio, Ruben Burgos-Vargas, Fabrizia Corona, Richard Vesely, Helen Foster, Joyce Davidson, Francesco Zulian, Line Asplin, Eileen Baildam, Julia Garcia Consuegra, Huri Ozdogan, Rotraud Saurenmann, Rik Joos, Angela Pistorio, Pat Woo, Alberto Martini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) at an intermediate dosage (15 mg/m(2)/week) versus a higher dosage (30 mg/m(2)/week) in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who failed to improve while receiving standard dosages of MTX (8-12.5 mg/m(2)/week).
METHODS: In the screening phase, 595 patients who were newly started on a standard dose of MTX were followed up for 6 months. Subsequently, the nonresponders, defined according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric 30% improvement criteria (pediatric 30), were randomized to receive an intermediate dose or higher dose of parenteral MTX for an additional 6 months. Improvement in the screening and randomization phase was defined by the ACR pediatric 30 response, as well as by the 50% and 70% response levels (ACR pediatric 50 and ACR pediatric 70, respectively).
RESULTS: In the screening phase, after receiving standard doses of MTX, 430 patients (72%) improved according to the ACR pediatric 30, while 360 (61%) met the ACR pediatric 50 and 225 (38%) met the ACR pediatric 70; among these patients, 69 (12%) also met the definition of complete disease control. Of the 133 nonresponders, 80 were randomized to receive an intermediate dose or higher dose of MTX. In the randomization phase, the ACR pediatric 30 response rate was 25 of 40 children (62.5%) in the intermediate-dose group versus 23 of 40 children (57.5%) in the higher-dose group. An ACR pediatric 50 response rate was attained by 23 patients (57.5%) receiving an intermediate dose versus 22 (55%) in the higher-dose group. An ACR pediatric 70 response rate was seen in 18 children (45%) receiving an intermediate dose versus 19 (47.5%) receiving a higher dose. Five children (12.5%) in the intermediate-dose group versus 4 (10%) receiving the higher dose of MTX also met the definition of complete disease control. None of the intergroup differences in response rate were significant. There were no significant differences in the frequency of adverse events or laboratory abnormalities between the 2 randomized groups.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that the plateau of efficacy of MTX in JIA is reached with parenteral administration of 15 mg/m(2)/week and that a further increase in dosage is not associated with any additional therapeutic benefit. MTX should be administered for up to 9-12 months to appreciate its full therapeutic effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248217     DOI: 10.1002/art.20288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  80 in total

Review 1.  Defining juvenile idiopathic arthritis remission and optimum time for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug withdrawal: why we need a consensus.

Authors:  Thomas Broughton; Kate Armon
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Juvenile spondyloarthritis treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Shirley M L Tse; Ruben Burgos-Vargas; Robert A Colbert
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.378

Review 3.  In juvenile idiopathic arthritis, is folate supplementation effective against methotrexate toxicity at the expense of methotrexate's efficacy?

Authors:  O G Killeen; J M Gardner-Medwin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Update on the medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Philip J Hashkes; Ronald M Laxer
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  [The treatment of juvenile rheumatism: pharmacotherapy].

Authors:  F Weller; H-I Huppertz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Low-dose methotrexate results in the selective accumulation of aminoimidazole carboxamide ribotide in an erythroblastoid cell line.

Authors:  Ryan S Funk; Leon van Haandel; Mara L Becker; J Steven Leeder
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 7.  Optimizing treatment in paediatric rheumatology--lessons from oncology.

Authors:  Tim Niehues
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  Network in pediatric rheumatology: the example of the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization.

Authors:  Nicolino Ruperto; Alberto Martini
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.764

9.  Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: management and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Natasha M Ruth; Murray H Passo
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

10.  Improvement of functional ability in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis by treatment with etanercept.

Authors:  M Halbig; G Horneff
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.