Literature DB >> 15247402

Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and aRabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray.

Teruaki Taji1, Motoaki Seki, Masakazu Satou, Tetsuya Sakurai, Masatomo Kobayashi, Kanako Ishiyama, Yoshihiro Narusaka, Mari Narusaka, Jian-Kang Zhu, Kazuo Shinozaki.   

Abstract

Salt cress (Thellungiella halophila), a halophyte, is a genetic model system with a small plant size, short life cycle, copious seed production, small genome size, and an efficient transformation. Its genes have a high sequence identity (90%-95% at cDNA level) to genes of its close relative, Arabidopsis. These qualities are advantageous not only in genetics but also in genomics, such as gene expression profiling using Arabidopsis cDNA microarrays. Although salt cress plants are salt tolerant and can grow in 500 mm NaCl medium, they do not have salt glands or other morphological alterations either before or after salt adaptation. This suggests that the salt tolerance in salt cress results from mechanisms that are similar to those operating in glycophytes. To elucidate the differences in the regulation of salt tolerance between salt cress and Arabidopsis, we analyzed the gene expression profiles in salt cress by using a full-length Arabidopsis cDNA microarray. In salt cress, only a few genes were induced by 250 mm NaCl stress in contrast to Arabidopsis. Notably a large number of known abiotic- and biotic-stress inducible genes, including Fe-SOD, P5CS, PDF1.2, AtNCED, P-protein, beta-glucosidase, and SOS1, were expressed in salt cress at high levels even in the absence of stress. Under normal growing conditions, salt cress accumulated Pro at much higher levels than did Arabidopsis, and this corresponded to a higher expression of AtP5CS in salt cress, a key enzyme of Pro biosynthesis. Furthermore, salt cress was more tolerant to oxidative stress than Arabidopsis. Stress tolerance of salt cress may be due to constitutive overexpression of many genes that function in stress tolerance and that are stress inducible in Arabidopsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15247402      PMCID: PMC519083          DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.039909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  39 in total

Review 1.  Genome relationships: the grass model in current research.

Authors:  K M Devos; M D Gale
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit.

Authors:  H X Zhang; E Blumwald
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Overexpression of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Huazhong Shi; Byeong-ha Lee; Shaw-Jye Wu; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Plants pass the salt.

Authors:  John M Ward; Kendal D Hirschi; Heven Sze
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  A stress-inducible gene for 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase involved in abscisic acid biosynthesis under water stress in drought-tolerant cowpea.

Authors:  S Iuchi; M Kobayashi; K Yamaguchi-Shinozaki; K Shinozaki
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Antisense suppression of proline degradation improves tolerance to freezing and salinity in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  T Nanjo; M Kobayashi; Y Yoshiba; Y Kakubari; K Yamaguchi-Shinozaki; K Shinozaki
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-11-19       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 7.  Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense.

Authors:  Barbara N Kunkel; David M Brooks
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.834

8.  Overexpression of [delta]-Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Synthetase Increases Proline Production and Confers Osmotolerance in Transgenic Plants.

Authors:  PBK. Kishor; Z. Hong; G. H. Miao; CAA. Hu; DPS. Verma
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Concomitant activation of jasmonate and ethylene response pathways is required for induction of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  I A Penninckx; B P Thomma; A Buchala; J P Métraux; W F Broekaert
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  179 in total

1.  Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in diverse soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes.

Authors:  Arun Prabhu Dhanapal; Jeffery D Ray; Shardendu K Singh; Valerio Hoyos-Villegas; James R Smith; Larry C Purcell; C Andy King; Perry B Cregan; Qijian Song; Felix B Fritschi
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Proteomic analysis of salinity-stressed Chlamydomonas reinhardtii revealed differential suppression and induction of a large number of important housekeeping proteins.

Authors:  Chotika Yokthongwattana; Bancha Mahong; Sittiruk Roytrakul; Narumon Phaonaklop; Jarunya Narangajavana; Kittisak Yokthongwattana
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Cloning and characterization of the Salicornia brachiata Na(+)/H(+) antiporter gene SbNHX1 and its expression by abiotic stress.

Authors:  Anupama Jha; Mukul Joshi; Narendra Singh Yadav; Pradeep K Agarwal; Bhavanath Jha
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Insights into salt tolerance from the genome of Thellungiella salsuginea.

Authors:  Hua-Jun Wu; Zhonghui Zhang; Jun-Yi Wang; Dong-Ha Oh; Maheshi Dassanayake; Binghang Liu; Quanfei Huang; Hai-Xi Sun; Ran Xia; Yaorong Wu; Yi-Nan Wang; Zhao Yang; Yang Liu; Wanke Zhang; Huawei Zhang; Jinfang Chu; Cunyu Yan; Shuang Fang; Jinsong Zhang; Yiqin Wang; Fengxia Zhang; Guodong Wang; Sang Yeol Lee; John M Cheeseman; Bicheng Yang; Bo Li; Jiumeng Min; Linfeng Yang; Jun Wang; Chengcai Chu; Shou-Yi Chen; Hans J Bohnert; Jian-Kang Zhu; Xiu-Jie Wang; Qi Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Exploiting the wild crucifer Thlaspi arvense to identify conserved and novel genes expressed during a plant's response to cold stress.

Authors:  Nirmala Sharma; Dustin Cram; Terry Huebert; Ning Zhou; Isobel A P Parkin
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Cell cycle progression in the pericycle is not sufficient for SOLITARY ROOT/IAA14-mediated lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Steffen Vanneste; Bert De Rybel; Gerrit T S Beemster; Karin Ljung; Ive De Smet; Gert Van Isterdael; Mirande Naudts; Ryusuke Iida; Wilhelm Gruissem; Masao Tasaka; Dirk Inzé; Hidehiro Fukaki; Tom Beeckman
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Abiotic stress and plant genome evolution. Search for new models.

Authors:  Anna Amtmann; Hans J Bohnert; Ray A Bressan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Molecular characterization of Brassica napus stress related transcription factors, BnMYB44 and BnVIP1, selected based on comparative analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and Eutrema salsugineum transcriptomes.

Authors:  Roohollah Shamloo-Dashtpagerdi; Hooman Razi; Esmaeil Ebrahimie; Ali Niazi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Low-affinity Na+ uptake in the halophyte Suaeda maritima.

Authors:  Suo-Min Wang; Jin-Lin Zhang; Timothy J Flowers
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  The Thellungiella salsuginea tonoplast aquaporin TsTIP1;2 functions in protection against multiple abiotic stresses.

Authors:  Li-Li Wang; An-Ping Chen; Nai-Qin Zhong; Ning Liu; Xiao-Min Wu; Fang Wang; Chun-Lin Yang; Michael F Romero; Gui-Xian Xia
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.