Literature DB >> 15241312

Glenoid suture anchor fixation strength: Effect of insertion angle.

Omer A Ilahi1, Tarek Al-Fahl, Hasan Bahrani, Zong-Ping Luo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of varying insertion angles on the fixation strength of screw-in devices placed in the glenoid rim. Type of study Cadaveric biomechanical analysis.
METHODS: Eighteen cadaveric glenoids had 3.0-mm cannulated screws inserted for a depth of 10 mm in all 4 quadrants: anterior superior (AS), anterior inferior (AI), posterior superior (PS), posterior inferior (PI). Screws were inserted along the orthogonal to the glenoid rim at the point of insertion or at angles that deviated from this vector by 20 degrees and 40 degrees. Load to failure was performed at 10 mm/s along the orthogonal to the point of insertion.
RESULTS: For screws inserted orthogonal to the glenoid rim, the average load to failure was highest for the PS quadrant (733 +/- 369 N) and lowest for the AI quadrant (272 +/- 69 N). The AS and PI quadrants showed intermediate values (549 +/- 334 N and 484 +/- 141 N, respectively). Deviation from orthogonal correlated with decreased fixation strength. This decrease was statistically significant in the AS and PI quadrants, with deviation of 40 degrees, and in the AI quadrant, with deviation of 20 degrees, as well as 40 degrees. Conclusions Insertion angles for screw-in fixation devices should be orthogonal to the glenoid rim at the point of insertion to maximize strength. Deviation of 40 degrees from orthogonal compromises fixation in most quadrants and deviation as little as 20 degrees can compromise fixation in the AI quadrant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To maximize strength of labral reattachment to the bony glenoid, screw-in type fixation devices should be inserted as orthogonal to the glenoid rim as possible. This is especially true for Bankart repairs, because device pullout occurs at significantly lower loads in the anteroinferior quadrant compared with the other 3 quadrants. Deviating as little as 20 degrees further decreases fixation strength significantly.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241312     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.04.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  6 in total

1.  Cyclic loading comparison of Bio-SutureTak-#2 FiberWire and Bio Mini-Revo-#2 Hi-Fi suture anchor-sutures in cadaveric scapulae.

Authors:  Brad S Sparks; John Nyland; Akbar Nawab; Ethan Blackburn; Ryan Krupp; Robert Burden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Restoring the labral height for treatment of Bankart lesions: a comparison of suture anchor constructs.

Authors:  Mark A Slabaugh; Nicole A Friel; Vincent M Wang; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Teaching simulated arthroscopic Bankart repair: residents’ assessment at the Annual Shoulder Course

Authors:  Dominique M. Rouleau; Rosalie Bedard; Fanny Canet; Yvan Petit
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Repair integrity and functional outcomes of arthroscopic repair in chronic anterior shoulder instability: single-loaded versus double-loaded single-row repair.

Authors:  Woo-Yong Lee; Hyun-Dae Shin; Kyung-Cheon Kim; Soo-Min Cha; Yoo-Sun Jeon; Jae-Hwang Song
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Arthroscopic repair of chronic bony bankart lesion using a low anterior portal.

Authors:  Jefferson C Brand; Paul Westerberg
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-11-09

6.  Arthroscopy Limits on Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Jair Simmer Filho; Raul Meyer Kautsky
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-10-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.