Literature DB >> 15240291

Effects of seeding procedures and water quality on recovery of Cryptosporidium oocysts from stream water by using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 1623.

Donna S Francy1, Otto D Simmons, Michael W Ware, Emma J Granger, Mark D Sobsey, Frank W Schaefer.   

Abstract

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method 1623 is widely used to monitor source waters and drinking water supplies for Cryptosporidium oocysts. Matrix spikes, used to determine the effect of the environmental matrix on the method's recovery efficiency for the target organism, require the collection and analysis of two environmental samples, one for analysis of endemic oocysts and the other for analysis of recovery efficiency. A new product, ColorSeed, enables the analyst to determine recovery efficiency by using modified seeded oocysts that can be differentiated from endemic organisms in a single sample. Twenty-nine stream water samples and one untreated effluent sample from a cattle feedlot were collected in triplicate to compare modified seeding procedures to conventional seeding procedures that use viable, unmodified oocysts. Significant negative correlations were found between the average oocyst recovery and turbidity or suspended sediment; this was especially apparent in samples with turbidities greater than 100 nephelometric turbidity units and suspended sediment concentrations greater than 100 mg/liter. Cryptosporidium oocysts were found in 16.7% of the unseeded environmental samples, and concentrations, adjusted for recoveries, ranged from 4 to 80 oocysts per 10 liters. Determining recovery efficiency also provided data to calculate detection limits; these ranged from <2 to <215 oocysts per 10 liters. Recoveries of oocysts ranged from 2.0 to 61% for viable oocysts and from 3.0 to 59% for modified oocysts. The recoveries between the two seeding procedures were highly correlated (r = 0.802) and were not significantly different. Recoveries by using modified oocysts, therefore, were comparable to recoveries by using conventional seeding procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15240291      PMCID: PMC444769          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4118-4128.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  14 in total

1.  Concentration and detection of cryptosporidium oocysts in surface water samples by method 1622 using ultrafiltration and capsule filtration.

Authors:  O D Simmons; M D Sobsey; C D Heaney; F W Schaefer; D S Francy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Occurrence of pathogenic microorganisms in the Saint Lawrence River (Canada) and comparison of health risks for populations using it as their source of drinking water.

Authors:  P Payment; A Berte; M Prévost; B Ménard; B Barbeau
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Effects of pH and magnetic material on immunomagnetic separation of Cryptosporidium oocysts from concentrated water samples.

Authors:  Ryan C Kuhn; Channah M Rock; Kevin H Oshima
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in sewage effluents and correlation with microbial, chemical and physical water variables.

Authors:  Lucia Bonadonna; Rossella Briancesco; Massimo Ottaviani; Enrico Veschetti
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Evaluation of immunomagnetic separation for recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis from high-iron matrices.

Authors:  G P Yakub; K L Stadterman-Knauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from a wide variety of 10-L surface water samples.

Authors:  Ryan C Kuhn; Kevin H Oshima
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Comparison of method 1623 and cell culture-PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in source waters.

Authors:  Mark W LeChevallier; George D Di Giovanni; Jennifer L Clancy; Zia Bukhari; Shan Bukhari; Jeffrey S Rosen; Jose Sobrinho; Michelle M Frey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Immunomagnetic separation of Cryptosporidium parvum from source water samples of various turbidities.

Authors:  Z Bukhari; R M McCuin; C R Fricker; J L Clancy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of an alternative IMS dissociation procedure for use with Method 1622: detection of Cryptosporidium in water.

Authors:  Michael W Ware; Larry Wymer; H D Alan Lindquist; Frank W Schaefer
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.363

10.  Evaluation of an internal positive control for Cryptosporidium and Giardia testing in water samples.

Authors:  M Warnecke; C Weir; G Vesey
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.858

View more
  5 in total

1.  Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water: effect of the number of samples and analytic replicates on test results.

Authors:  Lihua Xiao; Kerri A Alderisio; Jianlin Jiang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Identification of particle size classes inhibiting protozoan recovery from surface water samples via U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method 1623.

Authors:  Leigh-Anne H Krometis; Gregory W Characklis; Mark D Sobsey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of filters for concentrating microbial indicators and pathogens in lake water samples.

Authors:  Donna S Francy; Erin A Stelzer; Amie M G Brady; Carrie Huitger; Rebecca N Bushon; Hon S Ip; Michael W Ware; Eric N Villegas; Vicente Gallardo; H D Alan Lindquist
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Improved risk analysis by dual direct detection of total and infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts on cell culture in combination with immunofluorescence assay.

Authors:  Cindy Lalancette; George D Di Giovanni; Michèle Prévost
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evaluation of an Ultrafiltration-Based Procedure for Simultaneous Recovery of Diverse Microbes in Source Waters.

Authors:  Amy M Kahler; Trisha B Johnson; Donghyun Hahn; Jothikumar Narayanan; Gordana Derado; Vincent R Hill
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.103

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.