Literature DB >> 12571019

Comparison of method 1623 and cell culture-PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in source waters.

Mark W LeChevallier1, George D Di Giovanni, Jennifer L Clancy, Zia Bukhari, Shan Bukhari, Jeffrey S Rosen, Jose Sobrinho, Michelle M Frey.   

Abstract

Analysis of Cryptosporidium occurrence in six watersheds by method 1623 and the integrated cell culture-PCR (CC-PCR) technique provided an opportunity to evaluate these two methods. The average recovery efficiencies were 58.5% for the CC-PCR technique and 72% for method 1623, but the values were not significantly different (P = 0.06). Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected in 60 of 593 samples (10.1%) by method 1623. Infectious oocysts were detected in 22 of 560 samples (3.9%) by the CC-PCR technique. There was 87% agreement between the total numbers of samples positive as determined by method 1623 and CC-PCR for four of the sites. The other two sites had 16.3 and 24% correspondence between the methods. Infectious oocysts were detected in all of the watersheds. Overall, approximately 37% of the Cryptosporidium oocysts detected by the immunofluorescence method were viable and infectious. DNA sequence analysis of the Cryptosporidium parvum isolates detected by CC-PCR showed the presence of both the bovine and human genotypes. More than 90% of the C. parvum isolates were identified as having the bovine or bovine-like genotype. The estimates of the concentrations of infectious Cryptosporidium and the resulting daily and annual risks of infection compared well for the two methods. The results suggest that most surface water systems would require, on average, a 3-log reduction in source water Cryptosporidium levels to meet potable water goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12571019      PMCID: PMC143665          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.971-979.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  20 in total

1.  Concentration and detection of cryptosporidium oocysts in surface water samples by method 1622 using ultrafiltration and capsule filtration.

Authors:  O D Simmons; M D Sobsey; C D Heaney; F W Schaefer; D S Francy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the 70-kilodalton heat shock protein (HSP70) gene.

Authors:  I M Sulaiman; U M Morgan; R C Thompson; A A Lal; L Xiao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evaluation of Cryptosporidium parvum genotyping techniques.

Authors:  I M Sulaiman; L Xiao; A A Lal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparative development of Cryptosporidium parvum (Apicomplexa) in 11 continuous host cell lines.

Authors:  S J Upton; M Tilley; D B Brillhart
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Detection of the Cryptosporidium parvum "human" genotype in a dugong (Dugong dugon).

Authors:  U M Morgan; L Xiao; B D Hill; P O'Donoghue; J Limor; A Lal; R C Thompson
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.276

6.  A most-probable-number assay for enumeration of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

Authors:  T R Slifko; D E Huffman; J B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Molecular epidemiological analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in the United Kingdom: results of genotyping Cryptosporidium spp. in 1,705 fecal samples from humans and 105 fecal samples from livestock animals.

Authors:  J McLauchlin; C Amar; S Pedraza-Díaz; G L Nichols
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Risk assessment for Cryptosporidium: a hierarchical Bayesian analysis of human dose response data.

Authors:  M J Messner; C L Chappell; P C Okhuysen
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  A simple and reliable method of producing in vitro infections of Cryptosporidium parvum (Apicomplexa).

Authors:  S J Upton; M Tilley; M V Nesterenko; D B Brillhart
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Development of a microtitre ELISA to quantify development of Cryptosporidium parvum in vitro.

Authors:  K M Woods; M V Nesterenko; S J Upton
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  17 in total

1.  Biofilm Sampling for Detection of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in a Southeastern Pennsylvania Watershed.

Authors:  Kristen Jellison; Daniel Cannistraci; Jenelle Fortunato; Colin McLeod
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of assays for sensitive and reproducible detection of cell culture-infectious Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis in drinking water.

Authors:  Anne M Johnson; George D Di Giovanni; Paul A Rochelle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Quantitative-PCR assessment of Cryptosporidium parvum cell culture infection.

Authors:  George D Di Giovanni; Mark W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Cryptosporidium oocyst detection in water samples: floatation technique enhanced with immunofluorescence is as effective as immunomagnetic separation method.

Authors:  Khuanchai Koompapong; Chantira Sutthikornchai; Yowalark Sukthana
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.341

5.  Effects of seeding procedures and water quality on recovery of Cryptosporidium oocysts from stream water by using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 1623.

Authors:  Donna S Francy; Otto D Simmons; Michael W Ware; Emma J Granger; Mark D Sobsey; Frank W Schaefer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Detection and genotyping of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum by oligonucleotide microarray.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Gary J Vora; David A Stenger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Improved risk analysis by dual direct detection of total and infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts on cell culture in combination with immunofluorescence assay.

Authors:  Cindy Lalancette; George D Di Giovanni; Michèle Prévost
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Occurrence of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis in healthy adult domestic ruminants.

Authors:  José Antonio Castro-Hermida; André Almeida; Marta González-Warleta; José M Correia da Costa; Carlos Rumbo-Lorenzo; Mercedes Mezo
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Cryptosporidium propidium monoazide-PCR, a molecular biology-based technique for genotyping of viable Cryptosporidium oocysts.

Authors:  Cristin C Brescia; Shannon M Griffin; Michael W Ware; Eunice A Varughese; Andrey I Egorov; Eric N Villegas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Aged HCT-8 cell monolayers support Cryptosporidium parvum infection.

Authors:  Laura Y Sifuentes; George D Di Giovanni
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.