Literature DB >> 15238543

Detecting selection in noncoding regions of nucleotide sequences.

Wendy S W Wong1, Rasmus Nielsen.   

Abstract

We present a maximum-likelihood method for examining the selection pressure and detecting positive selection in noncoding regions using multiple aligned DNA sequences. The rate of substitution in noncoding regions relative to the rate of synonymous substitution in coding regions is modeled by a parameter zeta. When a site in a noncoding region is evolving neutrally zeta = 1, while zeta > 1 indicates the action of positive selection, and zeta < 1 suggests negative selection. Using a combined model for the evolution of noncoding and coding regions, we develop two likelihood-ratio tests for the detection of selection in noncoding regions. Data analysis of both simulated and real viral data is presented. Using the new method we show that positive selection in viruses is acting primarily in protein-coding regions and is rare or absent in noncoding regions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15238543      PMCID: PMC1470900          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.102.010959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

1.  Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites.

Authors:  Z Yang; R Nielsen; N Goldman; A M Pedersen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Novel variants related to TT virus distributed widely in China.

Authors:  Kangxian Luo; Haitang He; Zhihua Liu; Dingxie Liu; Hong Xiao; Xiaojing Jiang; Weifang Liang; Lian Zhang
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Long term trends in the evolution of H(3) HA1 human influenza type A.

Authors:  W M Fitch; R M Bush; C A Bender; N J Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Large-scale search for genes on which positive selection may operate.

Authors:  T Endo; K Ikeo; T Gojobori
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Evolutionary analyses of DNA sequences subject to constraints of secondary structure.

Authors:  S V Muse
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome.

Authors:  S V Muse; B S Gaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.

Authors:  N Goldman; Z Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Mammalian reovirus L2 gene and lambda2 core spike protein sequences and whole-genome comparisons of reoviruses type 1 Lang, type 2 Jones, and type 3 Dearing.

Authors:  L A Breun; T J Broering; A M McCutcheon; S J Harrison; C L Luongo; M L Nibert
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; H Kishino; T Yano
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  43 in total

1.  Integrating evolutionary and functional approaches to infer adaptation at specific loci.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Christopher W Wheat
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Correlated Selection on Amino Acid Deletion and Replacement in Mammalian Protein Sequences.

Authors:  Yichen Zheng; Dan Graur; Ricardo B R Azevedo
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies.

Authors:  Katherine S Pollard; Melissa J Hubisz; Kate R Rosenbloom; Adam Siepel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  An effective model for natural selection in promoters.

Authors:  Michael M Hoffman; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Complex interplay of evolutionary forces in the ladybird homeobox genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Maria Anisimova; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evidence that purifying selection acts on promoter sequences.

Authors:  Robert K Arthur; Ilya Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Putting pleiotropy and selection into context defines a new paradigm for interpreting genetic data.

Authors:  Irene M Predazzi; Antonis Rokas; Amos Deinard; Nathalie Schnetz-Boutaud; Nicholas D Williams; William S Bush; Alessandra Tacconelli; Klaus Friedrich; Sergio Fazio; Giuseppe Novelli; Jonathan L Haines; Giorgio Sirugo; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2013-04-24

8.  Statistical tests for natural selection on regulatory regions based on the strength of transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Alan M Moses
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Molecular adaptation of rbcL in the heterophyllous aquatic plant Potamogeton.

Authors:  Satoko Iida; Atsuko Miyagi; Seishiro Aoki; Motomi Ito; Yasuro Kadono; Keiko Kosuge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Exonic remnants of whole-genome duplication reveal cis-regulatory function of coding exons.

Authors:  Xianjun Dong; Pavla Navratilova; David Fredman; Øyvind Drivenes; Thomas S Becker; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.