BACKGROUND: Patients with massive pulmonary embolism and obstructive shock usually require hemodynamic stabilization and thrombolysis. Little is known about the optimal and proper use of volume infusion and vasoactive drugs, or about the titration of thrombolytic agents in patients with relative contraindication for such treatment. The aim of the study was to find the most rapidly changing hemodynamic variable to monitor and optimize the treatment of patients with obstructive shock following massive pulmonary embolism. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten consecutive patients hospitalized in the medical intensive care unit in the community General Hospital with obstructive shock following massive pulmonary embolism were included in the prospective observational study. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, central venous pressure, mean pulmonary-artery pressure, cardiac index, total pulmonary vascular-resistance index, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and urine output were measured on admission and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours. Patients were treated with urokinase through the distal port of a pulmonary-artery catheter. RESULTS: At 1 hour, mixed venous oxygen saturation, systolic arterial pressure and cardiac index were higher than their admission values (31+/-10 vs. 49+/-12%, p<0.0001; 86+/-12 vs. 105+/-17 mmHg, p<0.01; 1.5+/-0.4 vs. 1.9+/-0.7 L/min/m2, p<0.05; respectively), whereas heart rate, central venous pressure, mean pulmonary-artery pressure and urine output remained unchanged. Total pulmonary vascular-resistance index was lower than at admission (29+/-10 vs. 21+/-12 mmHg/L/min/m2, p<0.05). The relative change of mixed venous oxygen saturation at hour 1 was higher than the relative changes of all other studied variables (p<0.05). Serum lactate on admission and at 12 hours correlated to mixed venous oxygen saturation (r=-0.855, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In obstructive shock after massive pulmonary embolism, mixed venous oxygen saturation changes more rapidly than other standard hemodynamic variables.
BACKGROUND:Patients with massive pulmonary embolism and obstructive shock usually require hemodynamic stabilization and thrombolysis. Little is known about the optimal and proper use of volume infusion and vasoactive drugs, or about the titration of thrombolytic agents in patients with relative contraindication for such treatment. The aim of the study was to find the most rapidly changing hemodynamic variable to monitor and optimize the treatment of patients with obstructive shock following massive pulmonary embolism. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten consecutive patients hospitalized in the medical intensive care unit in the community General Hospital with obstructive shock following massive pulmonary embolism were included in the prospective observational study. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, central venous pressure, mean pulmonary-artery pressure, cardiac index, total pulmonary vascular-resistance index, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and urine output were measured on admission and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours. Patients were treated with urokinase through the distal port of a pulmonary-artery catheter. RESULTS: At 1 hour, mixed venous oxygen saturation, systolic arterial pressure and cardiac index were higher than their admission values (31+/-10 vs. 49+/-12%, p<0.0001; 86+/-12 vs. 105+/-17 mmHg, p<0.01; 1.5+/-0.4 vs. 1.9+/-0.7 L/min/m2, p<0.05; respectively), whereas heart rate, central venous pressure, mean pulmonary-artery pressure and urine output remained unchanged. Total pulmonary vascular-resistance index was lower than at admission (29+/-10 vs. 21+/-12 mmHg/L/min/m2, p<0.05). The relative change of mixed venous oxygen saturation at hour 1 was higher than the relative changes of all other studied variables (p<0.05). Serum lactate on admission and at 12 hours correlated to mixed venous oxygen saturation (r=-0.855, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In obstructive shock after massive pulmonary embolism, mixed venous oxygen saturation changes more rapidly than other standard hemodynamic variables.
Authors: Karin Janata; Michael Holzer; Hans Domanovits; Marcus Müllner; Alexander Bankier; Amir Kurtaran; Hans C Bankl; Anton N Laggner Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2002-09-30 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Adnan T Bhutta; Jesse W Ford; James G Parker; Parthak Prodhan; Eudice E Fontenot; Paul M Seib; Brittany I Stroope; Elizabeth A Frazier; Michael L Schmitz; Jonathan J Drummond-Webb; William R Morrow Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 1.655