Literature DB >> 15234664

Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical paromomycin treatments versus meglumine antimoniate for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Rodrigo X Armijos1, M Margaret Weigel, Manuel Calvopiña, Manuel Mancheno, Roberto Rodriguez.   

Abstract

The randomized, controlled study compared the therapeutic efficacy and safety of two paromomycin-containing topical preparations with the gold treatment standard, meglumine antimoniate, and with each other in 120 Ecuadorian patients with ulcerated lesions. The two paromomycin treatment comparisons were double-blinded. Group 1 (n = 14) received 15% paromomycin plus 12% methylbenzonium chloride (PR-MBCL) dissolved in a soft white paraffin base, applied twice daily for 30 days. Group 2 (n = 40) was also treated for 30 days with 15% paromomycin plus 10% urea (PR-U) dissolved in the same paraffin base. Group 3 (n = 40) received 20mg/kg/day of IM meglumine antimoniate (MA) for 10 days as per Ecuadorian Ministry of Public Health recommendations at the time of the study. The 10-day treatment was completed by 90% of the MA group compared to 72.5% of the PR-MBCL (X2 = 4.0, P = 0.045) and 75% of the PM-U (X2 = 3.1, P > 0.05) groups whose treatment regime lasted 20 days longer than the MA treatment. Post-treatment lesion burning, redness, inflammation, and soreness were more common in the two paromomycin groups compared to MA group (P < 0.05). The frequency of treatment-related side effects in the two paromomycin groups was similar. Six weeks after the start of treatment, 80.6% of MA subjects were clinically cured compared to 48.3% in the PR-MBCL (X2 = 6.1, P = 0.014) and 40% in the PM-U groups (X2 = 12.6, P = 0.002). By 12 weeks, the proportion of clinically cured subjects in the MA (91.7%) compared to PM-MBCL (79.3%) or PM-U (70%) groups was not significantly different (P > 0.05). MA-treated subjects clinically cured by 12 weeks had a faster mean healing time (29.5 +/- 12.2 days) compared to those in the PM-MBCL (versus 43.1 +/- 14.4 days, t = -3.7, P = 0.001) or PR-U groups (43.5 +/- 17 days; t = -3.2, P = 0.002). During the 48-week post-treatment follow-up period, infection reactivation was observed in 15.2% of the MA subjects compared to 17.4% in the PM-MBCL and 10.5% PM-U of subjects diagnosed as clinically healed by 12 weeks (P > 0.05). The results suggest that although the time required for the clinical healing of ulcerated lesions takes longer, topical paromomycin may be an acceptable therapeutic alternative in endemic areas where meglumine antimoniate is not available, is too costly or medically contraindicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15234664     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  26 in total

1.  Comparative study of the efficacy of formulations containing fluconazole or paromomycin for topical treatment of infections by Leishmania (Leishmania) major and Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis.

Authors:  Samuel Vidal Mussi; Ana Paula Fernandes; Lucas Antonio Miranda Ferreira
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Coinfection of Leishmania guyanensis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome: Report of a Case of Disseminated Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Ecuador.

Authors:  Manuel Calvopina; Cristina Aguirre; William Cevallos; Alberto Castillo; Ibrahim Abbasi; Alon Warburg
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 3.  Kinetoplastids: related protozoan pathogens, different diseases.

Authors:  Ken Stuart; Reto Brun; Simon Croft; Alan Fairlamb; Ricardo E Gürtler; Jim McKerrow; Steve Reed; Rick Tarleton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Therapeutic options for old world cutaneous leishmaniasis and new world cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Begoña Monge-Maillo; Rogelio López-Vélez
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Efficacy of orally administered 2-substituted quinolines in experimental murine cutaneous and visceral leishmaniases.

Authors:  Hector Nakayama; Philippe M Loiseau; Christian Bories; Susana Torres de Ortiz; Alicia Schinini; Elsa Serna; Antonieta Rojas de Arias; Mohamed A Fakhfakh; Xavier Franck; Bruno Figadère; Reynald Hocquemiller; Alain Fournet
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Recent developments in drug discovery for leishmaniasis and human African trypanosomiasis.

Authors:  Advait S Nagle; Shilpi Khare; Arun Babu Kumar; Frantisek Supek; Andriy Buchynskyy; Casey J N Mathison; Naveen Kumar Chennamaneni; Nagendar Pendem; Frederick S Buckner; Michael H Gelb; Valentina Molteni
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers: a focus on epidemiology and treatment in 2015.

Authors:  Adrienne J Showler; Andrea K Boggild
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Study of in vitro drug release and percutaneous absorption of fluconazole from topical dosage forms.

Authors:  Claudia Salerno; Adriana M Carlucci; Carlos Bregni
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Cellular immune response profile in patients with American tegumentary leishmaniasis prior and post chemotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Luiza C Reis; Maria Edilenza F Brito; Marina A Souza; Angela C R Medeiros; Claudio J Silva; Carlos F Luna; Valéria R A Pereira
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

10.  Paromomycin: uptake and resistance in Leishmania donovani.

Authors:  Anupam Jhingran; Bhavna Chawla; Shailendra Saxena; Michael Peter Barrett; Rentala Madhubala
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 1.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.