Literature DB >> 15231856

Robotic surgery and cancer: the present state, problems and future vision.

Makoto Hashizume1, Kouji Tsugawa.   

Abstract

In the 1990s, laparoscopic surgery entirely changed the traditional style of surgical operations. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has spread rapidly and is now established as the standard treatment. However, besides cholecystectomy, endoscopic procedures are still not applied so widely to a variety of surgical operations. This is because laparoscopic techniques, such as suturing or ligation, make it difficult for surgeons to perform other kinds of operations and thus greatly increase their mental and physical stress. It is necessary to introduce various advanced technologies such as: surgical robots, three dimensional (3D) images, computer graphics (CG), computer simulation technology and others. Surgical robots, including the AESOP, da Vinci and ZEUS systems, provide surgeons with technologically advanced vision and hand skills. As a result, such systems are expected to revolutionize the field of surgery. However, there have so far been few studies which discuss the indications of robotic surgery for tumors/cancer. Therefore, herein we review various studies published in English to focus on the application of robotic surgery to tumors/cancer. We point out that there are several problems to be solved for robot surgery: i) price of surgical robots, ii) training systems for surgeon, iii) coverage by medical insurance, iv) downsizing and v) navigation system. In conclusion, we believe that, in the near future as robotic technology continues to develop, almost all kinds of endoscopic surgery will be performed by this technology. It will replace traditional surgery not only in the treatment of benign diseases but also in malignant illnesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15231856     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyh053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach.

Authors:  Catalin Vasilescu; Oana Stanciulea; Stefan Tudor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

Review 3.  MRI-guided laparoscopic and robotic surgery for malignancies.

Authors:  Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Hemiparesis after robotic laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation in steep Trendelenburg position.

Authors:  Ravindra Pandey; Rakesh Garg; V Darlong; Jyotsna Punj
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-08-07

6.  Vision 20/20: Molecular-guided surgical oncology based upon tumor metabolism or immunologic phenotype: Technological pathways for point of care imaging and intervention.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jonathan T Elliott; Tayyaba Hasan; Theresa V Strong; Daniel R Draney; Joachim Feldwisch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center.

Authors:  Young-Dong Yu; Ki-Hun Kim; Dong-Hwan Jung; Jung-Man Namkoong; Sam-Youl Yoon; Sung-Won Jung; Sang-Kyung Lee; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery.

Authors:  A Mehrabi; C L Yetimoglu; A Nickkholgh; A Kashfi; P Kienle; L Konstantinides; M R Ahmadi; H Fonouni; P Schemmer; H Friess; M M Gebhard; M W Büchler; J Schmidt; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic splenectomy: what is the real benefit?

Authors:  Dana-Elena Giza; Stefan Tudor; Raluca Roxana Purnichescu-Purtan; Catalin Vasilescu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A single centers preliminary experience.

Authors:  Mario Guerrieri; Roberto Campagnacci; Pierluigi Sperti; Giulio Belfiori; Rosaria Gesuita; Roberto Ghiselli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.