Literature DB >> 15230946

Plasma for fractionation: safety and quality issues.

A Farrugia1.   

Abstract

Plasma may be procured for use as a therapeutic product or as a raw material for manufacture of other products, and may be collected as a by-product of whole blood, or as a plasma donation from aphaeresis. When collected for fractionation, the quality and safety of the plasma are intimately linked to the quality and safety of the manufactured plasma derivatives. High quality plasma can be obtained either from whole blood or from plasmapheresis; quality can, however, be adversely affected by poor storage conditions after collection. Quality standards for plasma for fractionation are necessarily different than for plasma for transfusion and, with modern fractionation methods, certain quality aspects become less relevant. Similarly, the relevance of certain recent technological advances, such as nucleic acid testing (NAT), for maximizing the safety of plasma for fractionation are questionable, although their introduction through the linkage of recovered plasma to whole blood collection can improve the safety of fresh blood components. Viruses that are not screened for at blood banks may also be excluded from the plasma pool they are more clinically relevant when multiple products made from a pool may infect a large number of recipients, in contrast to components given to one or a small number of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230946     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00911.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  8 in total

1.  A comparative study of the effects of temperature, time and factor VIII assay type on factor VIII activity in cryoprecipitate in Iran.

Authors:  Azadeh Omidkhoda; Mohammad Reza Tabatabaei; Kamran Atarodi; Kamran Karimi; Abbas Rahimi Froushani; Ali Akbar Pourfathollah
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Proteomics: applications in transfusion medicine.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Biochemical and cellular markers differentiate recovered, in-line filtered plasma, and plasma obtained by apheresis methods.

Authors:  Jürgen Siekmann; Alfred Weber; Christoph Bauer; Peter L Turecek
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.996

4.  Factors affecting the quality of cryoprecipitate.

Authors:  Rajeswari Subramaniyan; Neelam Marwaha; Ashish Jain; Jasmina Ahluwalia
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

5.  Prospective multicentre study of the effect of voluntary plasmapheresis on plasma cholesterol levels in donors.

Authors:  M Rosa-Bray; C Wisdom; S Wada; B R Johnson; V Grifols-Roura; V Grifols-Lucas
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  The effect of plasmapheresis on blood pressure in voluntary plasma donors.

Authors:  M Rosa-Bray; C Wisdom; J F Marier; M-S Mouksassi; S Wada
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.144

7.  Redox Status, Procoagulant Activity, and Metabolome of Fresh Frozen Plasma in Glucose 6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency.

Authors:  Vassilis L Tzounakas; Federica Gevi; Hara T Georgatzakou; Lello Zolla; Issidora S Papassideri; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Sara Rinalducci; Marianna H Antonelou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 8.  Modern plasma fractionation.

Authors:  Thierry Burnouf
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2007-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.