Literature DB >> 15230930

The impact of Medicaid managed care on pregnant women in Ohio: a cohort analysis.

Embry M Howell1, Lisa Dubay, Genevieve Kenney, Anna S Sommers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of mandatory HMO enrollment for Medicaid-covered pregnant women on prenatal care use, smoking, Cesarean section (C-section) use, and birth weight. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Linked birth certificate and Medicaid enrollment data from July 1993 to June 1998 in 10 Ohio counties, 6 that implemented mandatory HMO enrollment, and 4 with low levels of voluntary enrollment (under 15 percent). Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) is analyzed separately; the other mandatory counties and the voluntary counties are grouped for analysis, due to small sample sizes. Study Design. Women serve as their own controls, which helps to overcome the bias from unmeasured variables such as health beliefs and behavior. Changes in key outcomes between the first and second birth are compared between women who reside in mandatory HMO enrollment counties and those in voluntary enrollment counties. County of residence is the primary indicator of managed care status, since, in Ohio, women are allowed to "opt out" of HMO enrollment in mandatory counties in certain circumstances, leading to selection. As a secondary analysis, we compare women according to their HMO enrollment status at the first and second birth. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Linked birth certificate/enrollment data were used to identify 4,917 women with two deliveries covered by Medicaid, one prior to the implementation of mandatory HMO enrollment (mid-1996) and one following implementation. Data for individual births were linked over time using a scrambled maternal Medicaid identification number. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The effects of HMO enrollment on prenatal care use and smoking were confined to Cuyahoga County, Ohio's largest county. In Cuyahoga, the implementation of mandatory enrollment was related to a significant deterioration in the timing of initiation of care, but an improvement in the number of prenatal visits. In that county also, women who smoked in their first pregnancy were less likely to smoke during the second pregnancy, compared to women in voluntary counties. Women residing in all the mandatory counties were less likely to have a repeat C-section. There were no effects on infant birth weight. The effects of women's own managed care status were inconsistent depending on the outcome examined; an interpretation of these results is hampered by selection issues. Changes over time in outcomes, both positive and negative, were more pronounced for African American women.
CONCLUSIONS: With careful implementation and attention to women's individual differences as in Ohio, outcomes for pregnant women may improve with Medicaid managed care implementation. Quality monitoring should continue as Medicaid managed care becomes more widespread. More research is needed to identify the types of health maintenance organization activities that lead to improved outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230930      PMCID: PMC1361040          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  12 in total

1.  Monitoring quality in Medicaid managed care: accomplishments and challenges at the year 2000.

Authors:  S Felt-Lisk
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Effects of Tennessee Medicaid managed care on obstetrical care and birth outcomes.

Authors:  C J Conover; P J Rankin; F A Sloan
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.265

3.  Medicaid prenatal care: a comparison of use and outcomes in fee-for-service and managed care.

Authors:  J W Krieger; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A comparison of capitated and fee-for-service Medicaid reimbursement methods on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  D M Oleske; M L Branca; J B Schmidt; R Ferguson; E S Linn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Prepaid versus traditional Medicaid plans: lack of effect on pregnancy outcomes and prenatal care.

Authors:  T S Carey; K Weis; C Homer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Medicaid managed care and infant health.

Authors:  A Levinson; F Ullman
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  The long-term effects of Medicaid managed care on obstetrics care in three California counties.

Authors:  M Tai-Seale; A T LoSasso; D A Freund; S E Gerber
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Comparison of cesarean section rates in fee-for-service versus managed care patients in the Ohio Medicaid population, 1992-1997.

Authors:  S M Koroukian; D Bush; A A Rimm
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Moving to mandatory Medicaid managed care in Ohio: impacts on pregnant women and infants.

Authors:  Genevieve Kenney; Anna Stauber Sommers; Lisa Dubay
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.

Authors:  David L DiGiuseppe; David C Aron; Lorin Ranbom; Dwain L Harper; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Arpit Misra
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-06-05

2.  Oregon's Coordinated Care Organizations and Their Effect on Prenatal Care Utilization Among Medicaid Enrollees.

Authors:  Lisa P Oakley; S Marie Harvey; Jangho Yoon; Jeff Luck
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

3.  Trends in maternal and infant health in poor urban neighborhoods: good news from the 1990s, but challenges remain.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Kathryn L S Pettit; G Thomas Kingsley
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The effect of the capitation policy withdrawal on maternal health service provision in Ashanti Region, Ghana: an interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  John Kanyiri Yambah; Kofi Akohene Mensah; Naasegnibe Kuunibe; Kindness Laar; Roger Ayimbillah Atinga; Millicent Ofori Boateng; Daniel Opoku; Wilm Quentin
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2022-10-21

5.  The effect of Medicaid managed care on prenatal care: the case of Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Heriberto A Marín; Roberto Ramírez; Paul H Wise; Marisol Peña; Yelitza Sánchez; Roberto Torres
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-05-17

Review 6.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

7.  Are Women of East Kazakhstan Satisfied with the Quality of Maternity Care? Implementing the WHO Tool to Assess the Quality of Hospital Services.

Authors:  Marzhan Dauletyarova; Yuliya Semenova; Galiya Kaylubaeva; Gulshat Manabaeva; Zayituna Khismetova; Zhansulu Akilzhanova; Akylbek Tussupkaliev; Zhazira Orazgaliyeva
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.429

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.