Literature DB >> 15226326

Multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential with concomitant administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM-9903) phase III study.

Emilio Alba1, Miguel Martín, Manuel Ramos, Encarna Adrover, Ana Balil, Carlos Jara, Agustí Barnadas, Antonio Fernández-Aramburo, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Margarita Amenedo, Antonio Casado.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III trial evaluated whether sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel (A-->T) reduced hematological toxicity, especially febrile neutropenia, compared with concomitant (AT) administration as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), every 21 days (A-->T) or six cycles of the combination doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (AT) every 21 days. Patients previously treated with anthracyclines received two cycles of doxorubicin followed by four cycles of docetaxel (A-->T), or three cycles of AT followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 21 days.
RESULTS: Febrile neutropenia was less common in the A-->T arm (29.3% of patients, 6.9% of cycles) compared with the AT arm (47.8% of patients, 14.8% of cycles; P =.02 and P =.0004, respectively). Asthenia, diarrhea, and fever occurred more frequently in the AT arm. The overall responses rates were 61% in the A-->T arm (95% CI, 50% to 72%) and 51% in the AT arm (95% CI, 39% to 63%). The median duration of response was 8.7 months (A-->T) and 7.6 months (AT); the median time to progression was 10.5 months (A-->T) and 9.2 months (AT); the median overall survival was 22.3 months (A-->T) and 21.8 months (AT); and no significant differences were found.
CONCLUSION: A-->T significantly reduced febrile neutropenia compared with AT in MBC patients and maintains comparable antitumoral efficacy. A-->T represents a valid option for the treatment of MBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15226326     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Safety Profile of Biosimilar Filgrastim (Zarzio/Zarxio): A Combined Analysis of Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Pere Gascón; Andriy Krendyukov; Nadja Hoebel; Sreekanth Gattu; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-09

3.  The Role of Combination Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jens Huober; Beat Thürlimann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Treatment for liver metastases from breast cancer: results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Xiao-Ping Li; Zhi-Qiang Meng; Wei-Jian Guo; Jie Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Isabel Alvarez López; Juan de la Haba Rodríguez; Amparo Ruiz Simón; Meritxell Bellet Ezquerra; Lourdes Calvo Martínez; Laura García Estévez; Álvaro Rodríguez Lescure; Dolores Isla Casado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Diagnosis and medical treatment of breast cancer. Cordoba Consensus of 2007.

Authors:  Juan de la Haba-Rodríguez; Emilio Alba; Agustí Barnadas; Eloisa Bayo; Antonio Llombart; Ana Lluch; Miguel Martín; José Andrés Moreno-Nogueira; Gumersindo Pérez Manga; Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure; Enrique Aranda
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Docetaxel: a review of its use in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Caroline Fenton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 9.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Gemcitabine single or combination chemotherapy in post anthracycline and taxane salvage treatment of metastatic breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 124 patients.

Authors:  Min Kyoung Kim; Sung-Bae Kim; Jin Hee Ahn; Soon Im Lee; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong; Hak-Hee Kim; Jung-Shin Lee; Yoon-Koo Kang; Woo Kun Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.