Literature DB >> 15226172

Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts'.

Robert Tibshirani1, Trevor Hastie, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Scott Soltys, Gongyi Shi, Albert Koong, Quynh-Thu Le.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Early cancer detection has always been a major research focus in solid tumor oncology. Early tumor detection can theoretically result in lower stage tumors, more treatable diseases and ultimately higher cure rates with less treatment-related morbidities. Protein mass spectrometry is a potentially powerful tool for early cancer detection. We propose a novel method for sample classification from protein mass spectrometry data. When applied to spectra from both diseased and healthy patients, the 'peak probability contrast' technique provides a list of all common peaks among the spectra, their statistical significance and their relative importance in discriminating between the two groups. We illustrate the method on matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization mass spectrometry data from a study of ovarian cancers.
RESULTS: Compared to other statistical approaches for class prediction, the peak probability contrast method performs as well or better than several methods that require the full spectra, rather than just labelled peaks. It is also much more interpretable biologically. The peak probability contrast method is a potentially useful tool for sample classification from protein mass spectrometry data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15226172     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  40 in total

1.  Precision enhancement of MALDI-TOF MS using high resolution peak detection and label-free alignment.

Authors:  Maureen B Tracy; Haijian Chen; Dennis M Weaver; Dariya I Malyarenko; Maciek Sasinowski; Lisa H Cazares; Richard R Drake; O John Semmes; Eugene R Tracy; William E Cooke
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  An insight into high-resolution mass-spectrometry data.

Authors:  J E Eckel-Passow; A L Oberg; T M Therneau; H R Bergen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  A novel comprehensive wave-form MS data processing method.

Authors:  Shuo Chen; Ming Li; Don Hong; Dean Billheimer; Huiming Li; Baogang J Xu; Yu Shyr
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Penalized feature selection and classification in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 5.  Proteomics and the analysis of proteomic data: an overview of current protein-profiling technologies.

Authors:  Erol E Gulcicek; Christopher M Colangelo; Walter McMurray; Kathryn Stone; Kenneth Williams; Terence Wu; Hongyu Zhao; Heidi Spratt; Alexander Kurosky; Baolin Wu
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-07

6.  A Bayesian approach to the alignment of mass spectra.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Kong; Cavan Reilly
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  A novel urine peptide biomarker-based algorithm for the prognosis of necrotising enterocolitis in human infants.

Authors:  Karl G Sylvester; Xuefeng B Ling; G Y Liu; Zachary J Kastenberg; Jun Ji; Zhongkai Hu; Sihua Peng; Ken Lau; Fizan Abdullah; Mary L Brandt; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Mary Catherine Harris; Timothy C Lee; Joyce Simpson; Corinna Bowers; R Lawrence Moss
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  A unified modeling framework for metabonomic profile development and covariate selection for acute trauma subjects.

Authors:  S Ghosh; D K Dey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  NITPICK: peak identification for mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Bernhard Y Renard; Marc Kirchner; Hanno Steen; Judith A J Steen; Fred A Hamprecht
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A scale space approach for unsupervised feature selection in mass spectra classification for ovarian cancer detection.

Authors:  Michele Ceccarelli; Antonio d'Acierno; Angelo Facchiano
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.