Literature DB >> 15223774

Exploration of low-dose estrogen effects: identification of No Observed Transcriptional Effect Level (NOTEL).

Edward K Lobenhofer1, Xiangqin Cui, Lee Bennett, P LouAnn Cable, B Alex Merrick, Gary A Churchill, Cynthia A Afshari.   

Abstract

Identifying a minimal dose capable of eliciting a biological response is a fundamental issue in a number of scientific fields, including: drug development, signal transduction research, and environmental toxicology. Frequently, proliferation, viability, and other assays based on the cellular response to a treatment are used to assess the threshold dose for minimal activity. Here we propose a novel approach for identifying the effects of low dose treatments and pinpointing the threshold dose. Using microarrays, we examined the transcriptional response of a hormone responsive breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) stimulated with various concentrations of estrogen. Previous studies have focused on transcriptional responses to physiologically relevant concentrations of estrogen. However, relatively few studies have examined the transcriptional effects of concentrations below normal physiologic levels. These doses may not stimulate the expression of any genes or, alternatively, may regulate a different subset of genes that had not been previously characterized as estrogen responsive. We used gene expression profiling, coupled with a detailed analysis of replicates, to measure estrogen effects on many transcriptional targets and found that only physiologically relevant doses of estrogen (1 x 10(-10) M and higher) were capable of inducing a transcriptional response. This study demonstrates the utility of gene expression profiling as a means to identify concentrations that do not elicit a change in gene expression, or simply a No Observed Transcriptional Effect Level (NOTEL). The identification of a NOTEL for a given compound may be beneficial in several different scientific disciplines. For example, in the development of therapeutic drugs, a NOTEL could be used to identify doses of pharmaceutical compounds that are no longer effective at modulating the expression of biomarkers of efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15223774     DOI: 10.1080/01926230490483324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  11 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of bioinformatics in toxicology: advancing toxicogenomics.

Authors:  Cynthia A Afshari; Hisham K Hamadeh; Pierre R Bushel
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Characterizing risk assessments for the development of occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  P A Schulte; E D Kuempel; N M Drew
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  A Rat Liver Transcriptomic Point of Departure Predicts a Prospective Liver or Non-liver Apical Point of Departure.

Authors:  Kamin J Johnson; Scott S Auerbach; Eduardo Costa
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Technical guide for applications of gene expression profiling in human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Julie A Bourdon-Lacombe; Ivy D Moffat; Michelle Deveau; Mainul Husain; Scott Auerbach; Daniel Krewski; Russell S Thomas; Pierre R Bushel; Andrew Williams; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Gene transcription, metabolite and lipid profiling in eco-indicator daphnia magna indicate diverse mechanisms of toxicity by legacy and emerging flame-retardants.

Authors:  Leona D Scanlan; Alexandre V Loguinov; Quincy Teng; Philipp Antczak; Kathleen P Dailey; Daniel T Nowinski; Jonah Kornbluh; Xin Xin Lin; Erica Lachenauer; Audrey Arai; Nora K Douglas; Francesco Falciani; Heather M Stapleton; Chris D Vulpe
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Mechanisms of toxicity of triphenyltin chloride (TPTC) determined by a live cell reporter array.

Authors:  Guanyong Su; Xiaowei Zhang; Jason C Raine; Liqun Xing; Eric Higley; Markus Hecker; John P Giesy; Hongxia Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The vanishing zero revisited: thresholds in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Helmut Zarbl; Michael A Gallo; James Glick; Ka Yee Yeung; Paul Vouros
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.192

8.  High-throughput, quantitative assessment of the effects of low-dose silica nanoparticles on lung cells: grasping complex toxicity with a great depth of field.

Authors:  Cédric Pisani; Jean-Charles Gaillard; Virginie Nouvel; Michaël Odorico; Jean Armengaud; Odette Prat
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Exposure to low-dose bisphenol A impairs meiosis in the rat seminiferous tubule culture model: a physiotoxicogenomic approach.

Authors:  Sazan Ali; Gérard Steinmetz; Guillaume Montillet; Marie-Hélène Perrard; Anderson Loundou; Philippe Durand; Marie-Roberte Guichaoua; Odette Prat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Considerations for Using Genetic and Epigenetic Information in Occupational Health Risk Assessment and Standard Setting.

Authors:  P A Schulte; C Whittaker; C P Curran
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.