Literature DB >> 1522341

The laboratory diagnosis of male Chlamydia trachomatis infections--a time for change?

T Crowley1, D Milne, J T Arumainayagam, I D Paul, E O Caul.   

Abstract

We carried out a two-phased study comparing the effectiveness of first-catch early morning urine (FCU) samples against urethral swabs for the detection of C. trachomatis in men. Four hundred and seventeen new and re-booked consecutive men, who attended the Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine, Bristol, having held their urine overnight, were recruited. Patients who had received antimicrobial chemotherapy in the preceding 2 months were excluded. Early morning FCU samples were obtained from 208 men followed by urethral swabs for the detection of C. trachomatis (phase I) and this order of collection was reversed for the remaining 209 patients (phase 2). A last-catch urine (LCU) was also obtained from all patients. All urethral and urine samples were examined by an amplified enzyme immunoassay (IDEIA, Dako Diagnostics Ltd). Initially, discordant samples were critically examined by direct immunofluorescence (Syva, 'Microtrak') which was used as the 'gold' standard in this study. We have shown that overall 42 and 4.7% of our symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients respectively were positive for C. trachomatis antigen by IDEIA. Furthermore 86.4 and 91.0% (phases 1 and 2) of the total C. trachomatis positive samples were detected by examination of an FCU sample. In contrast only 66.0 and 65.5% (phases 1 and 2) of the total positives were identified by examination of an urethral swab. These results show that an FCU sample not only has the advantage of being a non-invasive procedure but is also a very sensitive method, compared to swabbing the urethra for the detection of C. trachomatis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1522341     DOI: 10.1016/0163-4453(92)92099-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  7 in total

1.  Rapid enzyme immunoassay for determination of toxigenicity among clinical isolates of corynebacteria.

Authors:  K H Engler; A Efstratiou
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Epidemiology of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in England and Wales.

Authors:  I Simms; M Catchpole; R Brugha; P Rogers; H Mallinson; A Nicoll
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

3.  Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male students by examination of first catch urine.

Authors:  J Berry; T Crowley; P Horner; J Clifford; I D Paul; E O Caul
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-10

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urine of young Norwegian males by enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  O Scheel; G Anestad; R Mundal; B P Berdal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies.

Authors:  E J Adams; A Charlett; W J Edmunds; G Hughes
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Duplex PCR system for simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  K C Wong; B S Ho; S I Egglestone; W H Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.