Literature DB >> 1522206

The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors.

L R Schover1, S A Rothmann, R L Collins.   

Abstract

Seventeen consecutively recruited candidates for semen donation were evaluated by a psychologist with testing and a structured interview. Most men (71%) were motivated by financial compensation. Only 29% would donate semen if records were open to potential offspring. Fifty-nine per cent of the men were rated as excellent candidates from a psychological perspective and 35% were rated as acceptable with slight reservations. One was excluded as a donor. Psychological testing revealed mildly abnormal subscale scores for 35% of donors. Forty-seven per cent had histories of minor depressive or anxiety episodes and 35% had had periods of heavy alcohol use. Compared to oocyte donors at the same institution, the men were less altruistic, more affluent, and more likely to have abused alcohol. Women had more traumatic family and reproductive histories. Psychological evaluation can be a valuable tool in gamete donor selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1522206     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  The reduction of sperm donor candidates due to the abolition of the anonymity rule: analysis of an argument.

Authors:  P Guido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction.

Authors:  Andrea Mechanick Bravennan; Stephen L Corson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Selling blood and gametes during tough economic times: insights from Google search.

Authors:  Jonathan A Wu; Tin C Ngo; Cappy Rothman; Benjamin N Breyer; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Procuring gametes for research and therapy.

Authors:  D Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; C M Mazure; D L Olive; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Feasibility of an altruistic sperm donation program in Canada: results from a population-based model.

Authors:  Daria O'Reilly; James M Bowen; Kuhan Perampaladas; Riaz Qureshi; Feng Xie; Edward Hughes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Ann-Louise Gejerwall; Johannes Gudmundsson; Per-Olof Karlström; Nils-Gunnar Solensten; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.636

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.