Literature DB >> 15221937

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of DNA sequence copy number changes in Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Bettina Albrecht1, Michael Hausmann, Horst Zitzelsberger, Hubert Stein, Jörg Rüdiger Siewert, Ulrich Hopt, Rupert Langer, Heinz Höfler, Martin Werner, Axel Walch.   

Abstract

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) allows the identification of DNA sequence copy number changes at high resolution by co-hybridizing differentially labelled test and control DNAs to a micro-array of genomic clones. The present study has analysed a series of 23 formalin-fixed, paraffin wax-embedded tissue samples of Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BCA, n = 18) and non-neoplastic squamous oesophageal (n = 2) and gastric cardia mucosa (n = 3) by aCGH. The micro-arrays used contained 287 genomic targets covering oncogenes, tumour suppressor genes, and DNA sequences localized within chromosomal regions previously reported to be altered in BCA. DNA sequence copy number changes for a panel of approximately 50 genes were identified, most of which have not been previously described in BCA. DNA sequence copy number gains (mean 41 +/- 25/BCA) were more frequent than DNA sequence copy number losses (mean 20 +/- 15/BCA). The highest frequencies for DNA sequence copy number gains were detected for SNRPN (61%); GNLY (44%); NME1 (44%); DDX15, ABCB1 (MDR), ATM, LAMA3, MYBL2, ZNF217, and TNFRSF6B (39% each); and MSH2, TERC, SERPINE1, AFM137XA11, IGF1R, and PTPN1 (33% each). DNA sequence copy number losses were identified for PDGFB (44%); D17S125 (39%); AKT3 (28%); and RASSFI, FHIT, CDKN2A (p16), and SAS (CDK4) (28% each). In all non-neoplastic tissue samples of squamous oesophageal and gastric cardia mucosa, the measured mean ratios were 1.00 (squamous oesophageal mucosa) or 1.01 (gastric mucosa), indicating that no DNA sequence copy number chances were present. For validation, the DNA sequence copy number changes of selected clones (SNRPN, CMYC, HER2, ZNF217) detected by aCGH were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These data show the sensitivity of aCGH for the identification of DNA sequence copy number changes at high resolution in BCA. The newly identified genes may include so far unknown biomarkers in BCA and are therefore a starting point for further studies elucidating their possible role in Barrett's carcinogenesis. Copyright 2004 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221937     DOI: 10.1002/path.1576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  20 in total

Review 1.  Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 2.  Role of protein tyrosine phosphatases in cancer.

Authors:  Tasneem Motiwala; Samson T Jacob
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  2006

3.  Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Silke Lassmann; Roland Weis; Frank Makowiec; Jasmine Roth; Mihai Danciu; Ulrich Hopt; Martin Werner
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Recurrent cytogenetic aberrations in histologically benign, invasive meningiomas of the sphenoid region.

Authors:  Andrey Korshunov; Vasiliy Cherekaev; Ali Bekyashev; Regina Sycheva
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  HER2 amplification, overexpression and score criteria in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yingchuan Hu; Santhoshi Bandla; Tony E Godfrey; Dongfeng Tan; James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Xing Qiu; David G Hicks; Jeffrey H Peters; Zhongren Zhou
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Single nucleotide polymorphism-based genome-wide chromosome copy change, loss of heterozygosity, and aneuploidy in Barrett's esophagus neoplastic progression.

Authors:  Xiaohong Li; Patricia C Galipeau; Carissa A Sanchez; Patricia L Blount; Carlo C Maley; Jessica Arnaudo; Daniel A Peiffer; Dmitry Pokholok; Kevin L Gunderson; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-11

7.  Chromosomal instability and copy number alterations in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas G Paulson; Carlo C Maley; Xiaohong Li; Hongzhe Li; Carissa A Sanchez; Dennis L Chao; Robert D Odze; Thomas L Vaughan; Patricia L Blount; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Predictors of progression in Barrett's esophagus: current knowledge and future directions.

Authors:  Ganapathy A Prasad; Ajay Bansal; Prateek Sharma; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Molecular basis of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  R C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Occurrence of multipolar mitoses and association with Aurora-A/-B kinases and p53 mutations in aneuploid esophageal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Christiane D Fichter; Corinna Herz; Claudia Münch; Oliver G Opitz; Martin Werner; Silke Lassmann
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.