Literature DB >> 15221913

Variability in axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

Michael Schaapveld1, Renée Otter, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Vaclav Fidler, Joris A K Grond, Winette T A van der Graaf, Pieter L de Vogel, Pax H B Willemse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The axillary nodal status may influence the prognosis and the choice of adjuvant treatment of individual breast cancer patients. The variation in number of reported axillary lymph nodes and its effect on the axillary nodal stage were studied and the implications are discussed.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 1997, a total of 4,806 axillary dissections for invasive breast cancers in 4,715 patients were performed in hospitals in the North-Netherlands. The factors associated with the number of reported nodes and the relation of this number with the nodal status and the number of positive nodes were studied.
RESULTS: The number of reported nodes varied significantly between pathology laboratories, the median number of nodes ranged from 9 to 15, respectively. The individual hospitals explained even more variability in the number of nodes than pathology laboratories (range in median number 8-15, P < 0.0001). The number of reported nodes increased gradually during the study period. A decreasing trend was observed with older patient age. A higher number of reported nodes was associated with a markedly increased chance of finding tumor positive nodes, especially more than three nodes. The frequency of node positivity increased from 28% if less than six nodes to 54% if >/=20 nodes were examined, the percentage of tumors with >/=4 positive nodes increased from 4 to 31%. Multivariate analysis confirmed these results.
CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study showed a large variation in the number of reported lymph nodes between hospitals. A more extensive surgical dissection or histopathological examination of the specimen generally resulted in a higher number of positive nodes. Although the impact of misclassification on adjuvant treatment will have varied, the impact with regard to adjuvant regional radiotherapy may have been considerable. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221913     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  14 in total

1.  Statistical models for predicting number of involved nodes in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Sada Nand Dwivedi; Suryanarayana Deo; Rakesh Shukla; Elizabeth Kopras
Journal:  Health (Irvine Calif)       Date:  2010-07

2.  Axillary and supraclavicular recurrences are rare after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer.

Authors:  Elina T Siponen; Leila A Vaalavirta; Heikki Joensuu; Marjut H K Leidenius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Canadian breast cancer guidelines: have they made a difference?

Authors:  Steven Latosinsky; Katherine Fradette; Lisa Lix; Karen Hildebrand; Donna Turner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Lymph node ratio may be supplementary to TNM nodal classification in node-positive breast carcinoma based on the results of 2,151 patients.

Authors:  Nüvit Duraker; Bakir Bati; Zeynep Civelek Çaynak; Davut Demir
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Does the axillary lymph node ratio have any added prognostic value over pN staging for South East Asian breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Nakul Saxena; Mikael Hartman; Cheng-Har Yip; Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy; Lay Wai Khin; Nur Aishah Taib; Lai-Meng Looi; Siew-Eng Lim; Soo-Chin Lee; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prognostic Significance of the Number of Removed and Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Carcinoma Patients with 1-3 Axillary Lymph Node(s) Metastasis.

Authors:  Nüvit Duraker; Bakır Batı; Davut Demir; Zeynep Civelek Caynak
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-10-12

7.  The prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Yoon Kim; Mi-Ryeong Ryu; Byung-Ock Choi; Woo-Chan Park; Se Jeong Oh; Jong-Man Won; Su-Mi Chung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

8.  Using nodal ratios to predict risk of regional recurrences in patients treated with breast conservation therapy with 4 or more positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  William Castrucci; Donald Lannin; Bruce G Haffty; Susan A Higgins; Meena S Moran
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2011-06-30

9.  Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio for lymph-node-positive breast cancer- is it just a denominator problem?

Authors:  Upali W Jayasinghe; Nirmala Pathmanathan; Elisabeth Elder; John Boyages
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-03-11

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer significantly reduces number of yielded lymph nodes by axillary dissection.

Authors:  Thalia Erbes; Marzenna Orlowska-Volk; Axel Zur Hausen; Gerta Rücker; Sebastian Mayer; Matthias Voigt; Juliane Farthmann; Severine Iborra; Marc Hirschfeld; Philipp T Meyer; Gerald Gitsch; Elmar Stickeler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.