Literature DB >> 21720569

Statistical models for predicting number of involved nodes in breast cancer patients.

Alok Kumar Dwivedi1, Sada Nand Dwivedi, Suryanarayana Deo, Rakesh Shukla, Elizabeth Kopras.   

Abstract

Clinicians need to predict the number of involved nodes in breast cancer patients in order to ascertain severity, prognosis, and design subsequent treatment. The distribution of involved nodes often displays over-dispersion-a larger variability than expected. Until now, the negative binomial model has been used to describe this distribution assuming that over-dispersion is only due to unobserved heterogeneity. The distribution of involved nodes contains a large proportion of excess zeros (negative nodes), which can lead to over-dispersion. In this situation, alternative models may better account for over-dispersion due to excess zeros. This study examines data from 1152 patients who underwent axillary dissections in a tertiary hospital in India during January 1993-January 2005. We fit and compare various count models to test model abilities to predict the number of involved nodes. We also argue for using zero inflated models in such populations where all the excess zeros come from those who have at some risk of the outcome of interest. The negative binomial regression model fits the data better than the Poisson, zero hurdle/inflated Poisson regression models. However, zero hurdle/inflated negative binomial regression models predicted the number of involved nodes much more accurately than the negative binomial model. This suggests that the number of involved nodes displays excess variability not only due to unobserved heterogeneity but also due to excess negative nodes in the data set. In this analysis, only skin changes and primary site were associated with negative nodes whereas parity, skin changes, primary site and size of tumor were associated with a greater number of involved nodes. In case of near equal performances, the zero inflated negative binomial model should be preferred over the hurdle model in describing the nodal frequency because it provides an estimate of negative nodes that are at "high-risk" of nodal involvement.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21720569      PMCID: PMC3124077          DOI: 10.4236/health.2010.27098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health (Irvine Calif)        ISSN: 1949-4998


  31 in total

1.  Zero-inflated models for regression analysis of count data: a study of growth and development.

Authors:  Yin Bin Cheung
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  [Statistical analysis for count data: use of healthcare services applications].

Authors:  Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez; Betty Manrique-Espinoza; Sandra G Sosa-Rubí
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

3.  Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models.

Authors:  W Gardner; E P Mulvey; E C Shaw
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations.

Authors:  Tara G Martin; Brendan A Wintle; Jonathan R Rhodes; Petra M Kuhnert; Scott A Field; Samantha J Low-Choy; Andrew J Tyre; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Statistical kinematics of axillary nodal metastases in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Wayne S Kendal
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  A comparison of alternative models of prescription drug utilization.

Authors:  P V Grootendorst
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Profile of breast cancer patients at a tertiary care hospital in north India.

Authors:  D S Sandhu; S Sandhu; R K Karwasra; S Marwah
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  [Statistical distribution of involved axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer].

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Guern; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.276

9.  Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; A B Cruz; R Foster; B Gardner; H Lerner; R Margolese
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A demonstration of modeling count data with an application to physical activity.

Authors:  Donald J Slymen; Guadalupe X Ayala; Elva M Arredondo; John P Elder
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2006-03-21
View more
  7 in total

1.  Modeling Count Outcomes from HIV Risk Reduction Interventions: A Comparison of Competing Statistical Models for Count Responses.

Authors:  Yinglin Xia; Dianne Morrison-Beedy; Jingming Ma; Changyong Feng; Wendi Cross; Xin Tu
Journal:  AIDS Res Treat       Date:  2012-03-25

2.  Comparison of [(99m)Tc]tilmanocept and filtered [(99m)Tc]sulfur colloid for identification of SLNs in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jennifer L Baker; Minya Pu; Christopher A Tokin; Carl K Hoh; David R Vera; Karen Messer; Anne M Wallace
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Count data regression modeling: an application to spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Prashant Verma; Prafulla Kumar Swain; Kaushalendra Kumar Singh; Mukti Khetan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Bayesian Zero- Inflated Poisson model for prognosis of demographic factors associated with using crystal meth in Tehran population.

Authors:  Asma Pourhoseingholi; Ahmad Reza Baghestani; Erfan Ghasemi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Mariet Ghazarian
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2018-03-19

5.  Using statistical models to assess medical cost of hepatitis C virus.

Authors:  Mohsen Vahedi; Asma Pourhoseingholi; Sara Ashtari; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Maryam Karkhane; Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi; Azadeh Safaee; Zahra Kimia; Seyed Moayed Alavian
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2012

6.  Statistical count models for prognosis the risk factors of hepatitis C.

Authors:  Asma Pourhoseingholi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Farid Zayeri; Seyed Moayed Alavian; Mohsen Vahedi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2013

7.  Specific count model for investing the related factors of cost of GERD and functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Alireza Abadi; Asma Pourhoseingholi; Samira Chaibakhsh; Azadeh Safaee; Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2013
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.