Literature DB >> 1522190

Luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization using gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue before ovarian stimulation: a prospective randomized study of human chorionic gonadotrophin versus intramuscular progesterone.

P Claman1, M Domingo, A Leader.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the endocrine milieu and pregnancy rates in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) programme employing a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) when either human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) or progesterone were used for luteal phase support. A total of 121 IVF-ET treatment cycles were prospectively studied. All patients started leuprolide acetate in the midluteal phase and it was continued for at least 10 days. When oestradiol levels were less than 150 pmol/l, HMG was started. When at least three follicles were greater than or equal to 17 mm in diameter, HCG 5000 IU i.m. was given. Oocytes were retrieved using transvaginal ultrasound and embryos were transferred 48 h later. The patients' cycles were prospectively randomized to receive HCG (72 cycles) or progesterone (49 cycles) luteal support. The HCG group received 1500 IU i.m. on days 3, 6 and 9 after the initial trigger. The progesterone group received 12.5 mg i.m. q.d. starting from the day after the HCG trigger. The dose of progesterone was increased to 25 mg i.m. q.d. starting on the day of embryo transfer and continued for 17-21 days. If the patient became pregnant, this dose of progesterone was continued until fetal heart activity was visualized by ultrasound. Mean ages, number of eggs retrieved, embryos transferred, oestradiol levels on the day of the HCG trigger, oestradiol and progesterone at the time of embryo transfer were the same in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1522190     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

Review 1.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

2.  Prospective randomized comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal-phase support in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  E Araujo; L Bernardini; J L Frederick; R H Asch; J P Balmaceda
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Human chorionic gonadotropin combined with progesterone for luteal support improves pregnancy rate in patients with low late-midluteal estradiol levels in IVF cycles.

Authors:  Akihisa Fujimoto; Yutaka Osuga; Toshihiro Fujiwara; Tetsu Yano; Osamu Tsutsumi; Mikio Momoeda; Koji Kugu; Kaori Koga; Yutaka Morita; Osamu Wada; Yuji Taketani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles.

Authors:  H M Fatemi
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

5.  Is human chorionic gonadotropin supplementation beneficial for frozen and thawed embryo transfer in estrogen/progesterone replacement cycles?: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Masahide Shiotani; Yukiko Matsumoto; Eri Okamoto; Satoshi Yamada; Yuri Mizusawa; Kohyu Furuhashi; Hiromi Ogata; Seiji Ogata; Shoji Kokeguchi
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.