Literature DB >> 7819706

Prospective randomized comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal-phase support in assisted reproduction.

E Araujo1, L Bernardini, J L Frederick, R H Asch, J P Balmaceda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of two forms of luteal-phase supplementation, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and progesterone (P), during gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRh-a)/controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: The study was a prospective, randomized evaluation of 77 patients. Group 1 patients (n = 38) received 2000 IU of hCG, injected subcutaneously, on days 3, 6, 9, and 12 after transvaginal aspiration of the oocytes (TVA = day 0). Group 2 patients (n = 39) received 50-mg daily injections of intramuscular (i.m.) P from days 2 to 14 after TVA. Blood tests were performed on days 0, 5, 8, and 12 after TVA.
SETTING: The in vitro fertilization program of a tertiary care institution was the study setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were (1) pregnancy and implantation rates; (2) serum estradiol (E), P, and hCG levels; and (3) occurrence of side effects.
RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group 1 versus group 2 were similar (36.7 vs 35.3 and 12 vs 14%, respectively). Regardless of pregnancy occurrence, on days 8 and 12 after TVA, serum E and P levels were higher in group 1 than group 2 but the resulting E/P ratios were similar. Five of 38 patients (group 1) developed moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) right after the first or second supplementary hCG injection. In these patients, the mean serum E level on the day of hCG trigger injection was about 3250 pg/ml and the number of follicles was between 9 and 17. In 6 of 39 patients (group 2) allergic reactions were observed at the P injection sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, hCG administration as a form of luteal supplementation did not translate, in comparison to P, into significant benefits for the patients. At the same time, it significantly increased the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation. We suggest that whenever, during COH cycles, serum E levels are over 2500 pg/ml and the number of follicles exceeds 10, luteal support with hCG should be excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7819706     DOI: 10.1007/bf02215991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  24 in total

1.  The effect of HCG supplementation after combined GnRH agonist/HMG treatment in an IVF programme.

Authors:  J Belaisch-Allart; J De Mouzon; C Lapousterle; M Mayer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a luteal phase and early pregnancy supplement.

Authors:  J Smitz; P Devroey; B Faguer; C Bourgain; M Camus; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation after luteal human chorionic gonadotropin in in vitro fertilization stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog and menotropins.

Authors:  A Herman; R Ron-El; A Golan; A Raziel; Y Soffer; E Caspi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Efficacy of progesterone support in the luteal phase following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  S Daya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  The luteal phase after in-vitro fertilization and related procedures.

Authors:  A C Van Steirteghem; J Smitz; M Camus; L Van Waesberghe; J Deschacht; I Khan; C Staessen; A Wisanto; C Bourgain; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  D Navot; P A Bergh; N Laufer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Programming of ovarian stimulation with norethindrone acetate in IVF/GIFT cycles.

Authors:  S Gerli; J Remohi; P Partrizio; C Borrero; J P Balmaceda; S J Silber; R H Asch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH-agonist/HMG treatment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT.

Authors:  J Smitz; P Devroey; M Camus; J Deschacht; I Khan; C Staessen; L Van Waesberghe; A Wisanto; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Tubal embryo transfer as a treatment for infertility due to male factor.

Authors:  J P Balmaceda; C Gastaldi; J Remohi; C Borrero; T Ord; R H Asch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Immunohistochemical localization of estradiol and progesterone receptors in human uterus throughout pregnancy: expression in endometrial blood vessels.

Authors:  M Perrot-Applanat; M Deng; H Fernandez; C Lelaidier; G Meduri; P Bouchard
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

2.  Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles.

Authors:  H M Fatemi
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

3.  Is human chorionic gonadotropin supplementation beneficial for frozen and thawed embryo transfer in estrogen/progesterone replacement cycles?: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Masahide Shiotani; Yukiko Matsumoto; Eri Okamoto; Satoshi Yamada; Yuri Mizusawa; Kohyu Furuhashi; Hiromi Ogata; Seiji Ogata; Shoji Kokeguchi
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.