Literature DB >> 15221361

Severe esophageal damage due to button battery ingestion: can it be prevented?

D Yardeni1, H Yardeni, A G Coran, E S Golladay.   

Abstract

Batteries represent less than 2% of foreign bodies ingested by children, but in the last 2 decades, the frequency has continuously increased. Most ingestions have an uneventful course, but those that lodge in the esophagus can lead to serious complications and even death. Medline was used to search the English medical literature, combining "button battery" and "esophageal burn" as keywords. Cases were studied for type, size, and source of the batteries; duration and location of the battery impaction in the esophagus; symptoms; damage caused by the battery; and outcome. Nineteen cases of esophageal damage have been reported since 1979. Batteries less than 15 mm in diameter almost never lodged in the esophagus. Only 3% of button batteries were larger than 20 mm but were responsible for the severe esophageal injuries in this series. These data suggest that manufacturers should replace large batteries with smaller ones and thus eliminate most of the complications. When the battery remains in the esophagus, endoscopic examination and removal done urgently will allow assessment of the esophageal damage, and treatment can be tailored accordingly. There is a need for more public education about the dangers of battery ingestion; this information should be included as part of the routine guidelines for childproofing the home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221361     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-004-1223-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  33 in total

1.  Button battery ingestion: hazards of esophageal impaction.

Authors:  L Samad; M Ali; H Ramzi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Esophageal electrochemical burns due to button type lithium batteries in dogs.

Authors:  J Tanaka; M Yamashita; M Yamashita; H Kajigaya
Journal:  Vet Hum Toxicol       Date:  1998-08

3.  Perforation of Meckel's diverticulum by an alkaline hearing aid battery.

Authors:  G A Willis; W C Ho
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Esophageal perforation secondary to alkaline battery ingestion.

Authors:  C L Shabino; A N Feinberg
Journal:  JACEP       Date:  1979-09

5.  Acquired tracheo-oesophageal fistula after ingestion of a mercury button-battery.

Authors:  P P Van Asperen; I Seeto; D T Cass
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1986-10-20       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Esophageal burns secondary to disc battery ingestion.

Authors:  M D Maves; J S Carithers; H G Birck
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Tracheoesophageal injury secondary to disc battery ingestion.

Authors:  D Sigalet; G Lees
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 8.  Button battery ingestion: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  K M Kost; R S Shapiro
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1987-08

9.  Orogastric magnet removal of ingested disc batteries.

Authors:  V G McDermott; T Taylor; J P Wyatt; S MacKenzie; G M Hendry
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 10.  Button battery ingestions.

Authors:  D W Kuhns; D J Dire
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  19 in total

1.  Novel technique of repair of large tracheo-esophageal fistula following battery ingestion in children: review of two cases.

Authors:  Vaibhav Pandey; Ajay Narayan Gangopadhyay; Dinesh Kumar Gupta; Shiv Prasad Sharma; Vijayendar Kumar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  X-ray diagnosis with a bloating agent for foreign object ingestion.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tomishige; Zenichi Morise; Tatsuya Suzuki; Fujio Hara; Masahito Hibi; Takazumi Kato; Takashi Hashimoto
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Tension pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema during retrieval of an ingested lithium button battery.

Authors:  Tariq Parray; Saif M Siddiqui; Melissa Hughes; Shailesh Shah
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Clinical profile and outcome of aluminum phosphide-induced esophageal strictures.

Authors:  Rakesh Kochhar; Usha Dutta; Kuchhangi Sureshchandra Poornachandra; Kim Vaiphei; Suraj Bhagat; Birinder Nagi; Kartar Singh
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-09

5.  Compromised ventilation caused by tracheoesophageal fistula and gastrointestinal endoscope undergoing removal of disk battery on esophagus in pediatric patient -A case report-.

Authors:  Kyung-Woo Kim; Ji Yeon Kim; Jung Won Kim; Jang Su Park; Won Joo Choe; Kyung-Tae Kim; Sangil Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-23

6.  Aspiration pneumonia and esophagotracheal fistula secondary to button battery ingestion.

Authors:  Delecia R LaFrance; James G Traylor; Long Jin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  A 2-Year-Old Boy Who Developed an Aortoesophageal Fistula After Swallowing a Button Battery, Managed Using a Novel Procedure with Vascular Plug Device as a Bridge to Definitive Surgical Repair.

Authors:  Khalid M Alreheili; Mansour Almutairi; Ali Alsaadi; Ghousia Ahmed; Abdulrahman Alhejili; Taha AlKhatrawi
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-08-18

8.  [Ingestion of foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract of children and adolescents].

Authors:  R Behrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Spondylodiscitis complicated by the ingestion of a button battery: a case report.

Authors:  Praharaju Janaki Sudhakar; Jameela Al Dossary; Neelam Malik
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Sudden death following accidental ingestion of a button battery by a 17-month-old child: a case study.

Authors:  T Guinet; J M Gaulier; C Moesch; J Bagur; D Malicier; G Maujean
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.