Literature DB >> 15220766

Choice of primary anesthetic regimen can influence intensive care unit length of stay after coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Stefan G De Hert1, Philippe J Van der Linden, Stefanie Cromheecke, Roel Meeus, Pieter W ten Broecke, Ivo G De Blier, Bernard A Stockman, Inez E Rodrigus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics protect the myocardium during coronary surgery. This study hypothesized that the use of a volatile agent in the anesthetic regimen would be associated with a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), compared with a total intravenous anesthetic regimen.
METHODS: Elective coronary surgery patients were randomly assigned to receive propofol (n = 80), midazolam (n = 80), sevoflurane (n = 80), or desflurane (n = 80) as part of a remifentanil-based anesthetic regimen. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent variables associated with a prolonged ICU LOS.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in all groups. ICU and hospital LOS were lower in the sevoflurane and desflurane groups (P < 0.01). The number of patients who needed a prolonged ICU stay (> 48 h) was also significantly lower (propofol: n = 31; midazolam: n = 34; sevoflurane: n = 10; desflurane: n = 15; P < 0.01). Occurrence of atrial fibrillation, a postoperative troponin I concentration greater than 4 ng/ml, and the need for prolonged inotropic support (> 12 h) were identified as the significant risk factors for prolonged ICU LOS. Postoperative troponin I concentrations and need for prolonged inotropic support were lower in the sevoflurane and desflurane group (P < 0.01). Postoperative cardiac function was also better preserved with the volatile anesthetics. The incidence of other postoperative complications was similar in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of sevoflurane and desflurane resulted in a shorter ICU and hospital LOS. This seemed to be related to a better preservation of early postoperative myocardial function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220766     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Myocardial preconditioning with volatile anesthetics. General anesthesia as protective intervention?].

Authors:  H Buchinger; U Grundmann; S Ziegeler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Early cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane on left ventricular performance during coronary artery bypass grafting on a beating heart: randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Ino Huseidzinović; Stjepan Barisin; Nikola Bradić; Rudolf Milanović
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 3.  Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Authors:  Nathalie Nathan; Isabelle Odin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.

Authors:  David R McIlroy; Marcos G Lopez; Frederic T Billings
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  Volatile anaesthetics and cardiac protection in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Jasminka Kopić
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Postconditioning of sevoflurane and propofol is associated with mitochondrial permeability transition pore.

Authors:  Wei He; Feng-jiang Zhang; Shao-ping Wang; Gang Chen; Cong-cong Chen; Min Yan
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Meta-analysis of the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane versus propofol during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Feng Li; Yuan Yuan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Volatile anesthetic preconditioning modulates oxidative stress and nitric oxide in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Sathish Kumar Dharmalingam; G Jayakumar Amirtharaj; Anup Ramachandran; Mary Korula
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep

9.  Additive Effect on Survival of Anaesthetic Cardiac Protection and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Cardiac Surgery: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Alberto Zangrillo; Mario Musu; Teresa Greco; Ambra Licia Di Prima; Andrea Matteazzi; Valentina Testa; Pasquale Nardelli; Daniela Febres; Fabrizio Monaco; Maria Grazia Calabrò; Jun Ma; Gabriele Finco; Giovanni Landoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christopher Uhlig; Jakob Labus
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.