Literature DB >> 15220698

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and initial virologic response of a triple-protease inhibitor salvage regimen containing amprenavir, saquinavir, and ritonavir.

Amanda H Corbett1, Joseph J Eron, Susan A Fiscus, Naser L Rezk, Angela D M Kashuba.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantify the change in saquinavir and amprenavir exposure when combined and used with low-dose ritonavir; to evaluate 24-week safety and immunologic and virologic response. It was a randomized, nonblinded, prospective study. There were 11 HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-experienced, male and female subjects > or = 18 years old, median HIV-1 RNA and CD4(+) T-cell count of 4.86 log copies/mL and 10(6) cells/mm(3), respectively. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive saquinavir 1000 mg/ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours or amprenavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours for 7 days. After 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling, the third protease inhibitor (PI) was added, and pharmacokinetics sampling was repeated 14 days later. Subsequent PI dosage adjustments were based on real-time pharmacokinetic assessment. Saquinavir did not affect amprenavir or ritonavir pharmacokinetics. Amprenavir decreased area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12h)) and C(12h) for saquinavir 82 and 61%, and 74 and 75% for ritonavir. An adjusted PI regimen of amprenavir 600 mg/saquinavir 1400 mg/ritonavir 200 mg every 12 hours returned saquinavir exposure to baseline. At 24 weeks, HIV RNA declined a median of 1.55 log copies/mL and CD4(+) T-cell counts increased a median of 52 cells/mm(3). Gastrointestinal events predominated and were mild to moderate. These data suggest that amprenavir/saquinavir/ritonavir may be a viable salvage regimen in heavily PI-experienced individuals. New formulations of amprenavir and saquinavir may simplify this regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220698     DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200408010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of patients on dual-boosted PI regimens: experience of the Swiss HIV cohort study.

Authors:  Regina B Osih; Patrick Taffé; Martin Rickenbach; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Luigia Elzi; Christoph Fux; Milos Opravil; Enos Bernasconi; Patrick Schmid; Huldrych F Günthard; Matthias Cavassini
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.205

2.  Virologic efficacy of boosted double versus boosted single protease inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Yue Wang; Mark J van der Laan; Soo-Yon Rhee; Robert W Shafer; W Jeffrey Fessel
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Dose separation does not overcome the pharmacokinetic interaction between fosamprenavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.

Authors:  Amanda H Corbett; Kristine B Patterson; Hsiao-Chuan Tien; Leslie A Kalvass; Joseph J Eron; Linh T Ngo; Michael L Lim; Angela D M Kashuba
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Steady-state pharmacokinetics of atazanavir given alone or in combination with saquinavir hard-gel capsules or amprenavir in HIV-1-infected patients.

Authors:  Elena Seminari; Monica Guffanti; Paola Villani; Nicola Gianotti; Maria Cusato; Giuliana Fusetti; Andrea Galli; Antonella Castagna; Mario Regazzi; Adriano Lazzarin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Plasma bile acid concentrations in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection receiving protease inhibitor therapy: possible implications for hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  MaryPeace McRae; Naser L Rezk; Arlene S Bridges; Amanda H Corbett; Hsiao-Chuan Tien; Kim L R Brouwer; Angela D M Kashuba
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.705

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.