Literature DB >> 1521993

Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures.

D Assif1, A Fenton, G Zarb, A Schmitt.   

Abstract

In this study, four impression procedures were assessed for accuracy in a laboratory model that simulated clinical practice. The accuracy of stone casts with brass implant analogs was measured against a standard framework. The fit of the framework on the casts was tested by manual and visual judgment and by microscopic measurement. The measurements supported the clinical judgments. When acrylic resin was used to splint transfer copings in an impression, all casts were acceptable and were more accurate than the best of the two other procedures, which did not use an acrylic resin splint. When an impression material was used to orient the transfer copings, the accuracy was better if undercut copings remained in the impression. When impressions were made by removing an impression from smooth transfer copings and replacing the copings in the impression, the majority of casts were unacceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1521993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework.

Authors:  Hyeok-Jae Lee; Young-Jun Lim; Chang-Whe Kim; Jung-Han Choi; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Si-Hoon Jo; Kyoung-Il Kim; Jae-Min Seo; Kwang-Yeob Song; Ju-Mi Park; Seung-Geun Ahn
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sonam Gupta; Aparna Ichalangod Narayan; Dhanasekar Balakrishnan
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-02-27

6.  Comparison of the Accuracy of Fixture-Level Implant Impression Making with Different Splinting Techniques.

Authors:  Mehrdad Nateghi; Ramin Negahdari; Sahar Molaei; Ali Barzegar; Sepideh Bohlouli
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-10-14

7.  Effect of Implant Angulation on the Rotational Displacement of a 3-Unit Bridge after Digital Impression.

Authors:  Mahnaz Arshad; Amirmohsen Asgari; Mohamad Javad Kharazifard; Narges Ameri
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-01-25

8.  Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy between Open-Tray and Closed-Tray Implant Impression Technique in 15° Angled Implants.

Authors:  F Balouch; E Jalalian; M Nikkheslat; R Ghavamian; Sh Toopchi; F Jallalian; S Jalalian
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2013-09

9.  A sectional-splinting technique for impressing multiple implant units by eliminating the use of an open tray.

Authors:  Suryakant C Deogade; Gunjan Dube
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-04

Review 10.  Complications in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Ayesha Hanif; Saima Qureshi; Zeeshan Sheikh; Haroon Rashid
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.