Literature DB >> 15219194

Non-invasive diagnostic work-up of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism; results of a management study.

M Ten Wolde1, P J Hagen, M R Macgillavry, I J Pollen, A T A Mairuhu, M M W Koopman, M H Prins, O S Hoekstra, D P M Brandjes, P E Postmus, H R Büller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians often deviate from the recommended algorithm for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism consisting of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and pulmonary angiography.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and feasibility of a diagnostic algorithm which reduces the need for lung scintigraphy and avoids the use of angiography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism were prospectively investigated according to an algorithm in which the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was excluded after a low clinical probability estimate and a normal d-dimer test result, a normal perfusion scintigraphy result, or a non-high probability scintigraphy result in combination with normal serial ultrasonography of the legs. In these patients anticoagulant treatment was withheld and they were followed up for 3 months to record possible thromboembolic events. During the study period, 923 consecutive patients were seen, of whom 292 were excluded because of predefined criteria.
RESULTS: Of the 631 included patients, the diagnosis was refuted on the basis of a low clinical probability estimate and a normal d-dimer test result (95 patients), normal perfusion scintigraphy (161 patients) and non-high probability lung scintigraphy followed by normal serial ultrasonography (210 patients). Of these 466 patients, venous thromboembolic complications during follow-up occurred in six (complication rate 1.3%, 95% confidence interval 0.5, 2.8). The diagnostic protocol was completed in 92% of all included patients.
CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism can be safely ruled out by a non-invasive algorithm consisting of d-dimer testing combined with a clinical probability estimate, lung scintigraphy, or serial ultrasonography of the legs (in case of non-diagnostic lung scintigraphy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15219194     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00769.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  5 in total

1.  Pulmonary embolism: investigation of the clinically assessed intermediate risk subgroup.

Authors:  D J Warren; S Matthews
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part I. The Consensus for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Kang-Ling Wang; Pao-Hsien Chu; Cheng-Han Lee; Pei-Ying Pai; Pao-Yen Lin; Kou-Gi Shyu; Wei-Tien Chang; Kuan-Ming Chiu; Chien-Lung Huang; Chung-Yi Lee; Yen-Hung Lin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Hsueh-Wei Yen; Wei-Hsian Yin; Hung-I Yeh; Chern-En Chiang; Shing-Jong Lin; San-Jou Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  When to perform CTA in patients suspected of PE?

Authors:  Benoît Ghaye; Robert F Dondelinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  D-dimer value in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism-may it exclude only?

Authors:  Magdalena Sikora-Skrabaka; Damian Skrabaka; Paolo Ruggeri; Gaetano Caramori; Szymon Skoczyński; Adam Barczyk
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Influenza infection and risk of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Matthijs van Wissen; Tymen T Keller; Brechje Ronkes; Victor Ea Gerdes; Hans L Zaaijer; Eric Cm van Gorp; Dees Pm Brandjes; Marcel Levi; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2007-10-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.