Literature DB >> 15219154

The lack of recombination drives the fixation of transposable elements on the fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Carolina Bartolomé1, Xulio Maside.   

Abstract

In regions of suppressed recombination, where selection is expected to be less efficient in removing slightly deleterious mutations, transposable element (TE) insertions should be more likely to drift to higher frequencies, and even to reach fixation. In the absence of excision events, once a TE is fixed it cannot be eliminated from the population, and accumulation of elements thus should become an irreversible process. In the long term, this can drive the degeneration of large non-recombining fractions of the genomes. Chromosome 4 of Drosophila melanogaster has very low levels of recombination, if any, and this could be causing its degeneration. Here we report the results of a PCR-based analysis of the population frequencies of TE insertions in a sample from three African natural populations. We investigated 27 insertions from 12 TE families, located in regions of either suppressed or free recombination. Our results suggest that TE insertions tend to be fixed in the non-recombining regions, particularly on the fourth chromosome. We have also found that this involves all types of elements, and that fixed insertions are significantly shorter and more divergent from the canonical sequence than those segregating in the sample (28.1% vs 86.3% of the canonical length, and average nucleotide divergence (D(XY)) = 0.082 vs 0.008, respectively). Finally, DNA-based elements seem to show a greater tendency to reach fixation than retrotransposons. Implications of these findings for the population dynamics of TEs, and the evolutionary forces that shape the patterns of genetic variation in regions of reduced recombination, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15219154     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672304006755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  24 in total

1.  Common inheritance of chromosome Ia associated with clonal expansion of Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Asis Khan; Ulrike Böhme; Krystyna A Kelly; Ellen Adlem; Karen Brooks; Mark Simmonds; Karen Mungall; Michael A Quail; Claire Arrowsmith; Tracey Chillingworth; Carol Churcher; David Harris; Matthew Collins; Nigel Fosker; Audrey Fraser; Zahra Hance; Kay Jagels; Sharon Moule; Lee Murphy; Susan O'Neil; Marie-Adele Rajandream; David Saunders; Kathy Seeger; Sally Whitehead; Thomas Mayr; Xuenan Xuan; Junichi Watanabe; Yutaka Suzuki; Hiroyuki Wakaguri; Sumio Sugano; Chihiro Sugimoto; Ian Paulsen; Aaron J Mackey; David S Roos; Neil Hall; Matthew Berriman; Bart Barrell; L David Sibley; James W Ajioka
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXVI. Molecular structural analysis of Osvaldo retrotransposon insertions in colonizing populations unveils drift effects in founder events.

Authors:  María Pilar García Guerreiro; Antonio Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Low rates of homogenization of the DBC-150 satellite DNA family restricted to a single pair of microchromosomes in species from the Drosophila buzzatii cluster.

Authors:  Gustavo C S Kuhn; Fernando F Franco; Maura H Manfrin; Orlando Moreira-Filho; Fabio M Sene
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  The dynamics of the roo transposable element in mutation-accumulation lines and segregating populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Montserrat Papaceit; Victoria Avila; Montserrat Aguadé; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  DNA transposon dynamics in populations of Daphnia pulex with and without sex.

Authors:  Sarah Schaack; Ellen J Pritham; Abby Wolf; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The effects of recombination rate on the distribution and abundance of transposable elements.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Centromere-Proximal Meiotic Crossovers in Drosophila melanogaster Are Suppressed by Both Highly Repetitive Heterochromatin and Proximity to the Centromere.

Authors:  Michaelyn Hartmann; James Umbanhowar; Jeff Sekelsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Abundance and chromosomal distribution of six Drosophila buzzatii transposons: BuT1, BuT2, BuT3, BuT4, BuT5, and BuT6.

Authors:  Ferran Casals; Josefa González; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Pervasive epigenetic effects of Drosophila euchromatic transposable elements impact their evolution.

Authors:  Yuh Chwen G Lee; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Population genomic inferences from sparse high-throughput sequencing of two populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Timothy B Sackton; Rob J Kulathinal; Casey M Bergman; Aaron R Quinlan; Erik B Dopman; Mauricio Carneiro; Gabor T Marth; Daniel L Hartl; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.